neo

neo — CS2 Stats

76561197965733703[U:1:5467975]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,470Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,514Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3073 of 27923 tracked
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGneoPREMIER25,514 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning57
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51436Last 10051%Win rateLTWWLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.7
Utility4.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 12.8° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time590ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy27.6%+4.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–2
130Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2213959%0.01
mirageS2013765%0.02
dust2D1861233%0.01
anubisD103730%-0.02
nukeS96367%0.04
cacheS64267%0.03
overpassB63350%0.04
inferno41325%-0.01
office2020%-0.01
vertigo220100%-0.02
warden1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,334Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.5ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8340%1.0516.3
Ancient5845%1.1316.8
Anubis5044%1.1516.8
Dust23650%1.0314.7
Inferno2857%1.2118.1
Vertigo2654%1.2318.5
Overpass2556%1.0416.2
Nuke2133%1.0317.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
83.9%Counter-strafing
12.8°Preaim
584msReaction time
27.0%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
5.58HE damage / grenade
7.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.754° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient9–130.0719%29 Aug
office12–12-0.0122%29 Aug
cache13–70.0225%29 Aug
anubis13–50.0727%24 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0622%24 Aug
ancient0–13-0.068%23 Aug
dust28–130.0126%22 Aug
overpass9–40.0313%21 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0814%21 Aug
nuke10–130.0533%7 Aug
dust27–13-0.0616%5 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0123%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0338%2 Aug
cache13–20.0613%2 Aug
anubis8–130.0261%2 Aug
nuke13–60.0643%22 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0033%22 Jul
ancient13–60.0131%20 Jul
ancient16–120.0221%20 Jul
dust24–13-0.0823%20 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0718%18 Jul
anubis13–0-0.01100%10 Jul
ancient13–20.1535%10 Jul
ancient13–100.0133%9 Jul
dust213–3-0.0123%9 Jul
warden7–13-0.0229%2 Jul
dust213–100.0221%27 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0030%26 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0133%26 Jun
mirage8–130.0119%25 Jun
nuke16–130.0316%25 Jun
ancient13–5-0.0328%25 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0414%22 Jun
ancient8–130.0332%16 Jun
nuke13–70.1150%10 Jun
office5–13-0.0235%10 Jun
nuke13–80.1227%8 Jun
dust214–160.0323%8 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0621%5 Jun
nuke16–19-0.0224%3 Jun
vertigo13–8-0.0211%2 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0630%2 Jun
anubis13–20.0515%2 Jun
cache13–80.0225%2 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0228%1 Jun
dust24–13-0.0334%31 May
ancient15–15-0.0524%28 May
overpass8–13-0.0422%28 May
ancient13–100.0031%28 May
mirage15–150.007%28 May
inferno2–8-0.0427%27 May
anubis11–13-0.0825%24 May
dust214–160.0223%23 May
nuke15–150.0719%23 May
dust210–130.0718%23 May
mirage0–13-0.0327%22 May
nuke13–90.0625%22 May
ancient13–80.0627%22 May
mirage13–50.0419%22 May
mirage2–20.0033%22 May
ancient13–30.0736%22 May
inferno13–90.0215%21 May
dust213–80.1225%21 May
mirage11–130.0225%21 May
dust213–60.0524%20 May
mirage13–90.0629%20 May
mirage13–70.0336%15 May
anubis2–3-0.070%15 May
ancient3–13-0.0429%12 May
overpass13–110.1222%7 May
cache12–120.0116%6 May
mirage13–10-0.0528%6 May
anubis2–7-0.0029%6 May
mirage16–120.0232%5 May
mirage13–80.1235%5 May
cache10–130.0320%4 May
cache13–50.0414%3 May
ancient16–130.0521%28 Apr
mirage13–50.0626%28 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0214%27 Apr
dust27–13-0.0620%26 Apr
dust29–130.0339%26 Apr
overpass11–130.0928%26 Apr
mirage13–30.0423%26 Apr
mirage13–90.0628%25 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0220%25 Apr
dust27–13-0.0127%25 Apr
dust213–7-0.0236%25 Apr
dust28–130.0720%24 Apr
ancient13–110.0516%24 Apr
mirage13–80.0232%23 Apr
inferno8–80.0513%22 Apr
ancient13–5-0.0116%21 Apr
mirage13–100.0120%21 Apr
dust210–130.0125%21 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0314%21 Apr
dust213–10-0.0221%20 Apr
ancient13–90.0515%20 Apr
mirage9–130.0534%20 Apr
overpass13–30.0723%20 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →