cyfare — CS2 Stats

76561197965466165[U:1:5200437]

1,899Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,762 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcyfareFACEITLevel 10 · 2,762 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89
Positioning53
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLWWWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9
Aggression5.5
Utility5.5
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9
Positioning5.3
Utility5.5
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy28.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 29.8% → last ⅓ avg 28.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–4
130Biggest win — overpass
9Longest win streak
1410In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 18mirageWeakest map · 42% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.03
dust2B21111052%0.01
anubisS1812667%0.02
ancientA106460%0.01
overpassS64267%0.01
cache43175%0.07
inferno42250%-0.02
office330100%0.05
nuke31233%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,278Matches
53%Win rate
1.27Avg K/D
87.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage48952%1.3018.5
Dust228156%1.2418.6
Ancient18851%1.2718.1
Anubis8960%1.2517.6
Overpass7451%1.1617.4
Nuke6052%1.1617.3
Inferno5048%1.2617.6
Train2040%1.5020.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.2%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
554msReaction time
34.1%T opening success
47.4%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
11.6%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
11.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.1286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0233%27 Aug
anubis13–70.0230%13 Aug
office13–20.1129%13 Jul
dust213–90.0021%12 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0225%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0228%17 Jun
dust22–2-0.09100%14 Jun
ancient3–6-0.030%13 Jun
mirage13–40.0725%30 May
anubis4–13-0.0632%29 May
nuke11–130.0315%27 May
mirage15–19-0.0124%26 May
ancient13–30.1124%24 May
ancient16–130.0425%21 May
mirage13–30.0748%21 May
mirage13–110.0723%19 May
mirage7–130.0925%17 May
mirage14–16-0.0316%17 May
dust211–130.0236%17 May
anubis13–11-0.0025%16 May
ancient3–13-0.0732%16 May
dust213–90.0554%15 May
anubis13–50.1023%14 May
anubis4–13-0.0237%14 May
dust210–130.0431%11 May
mirage13–70.0128%11 May
anubis8–13-0.0210%10 May
mirage9–130.0128%10 May
cache16–130.0329%9 May
overpass7–13-0.0114%8 May
mirage9–130.0020%8 May
dust213–9-0.0418%7 May
overpass16–14-0.0216%6 May
mirage13–80.0524%4 May
mirage9–130.0119%4 May
anubis13–100.0820%3 May
dust29–13-0.0129%3 May
mirage3–130.029%3 May
dust26–130.0029%3 May
cache9–130.0821%2 May
dust211–130.0029%2 May
inferno13–3-0.0720%2 May
inferno13–10-0.0131%2 May
mirage17–19-0.0118%2 May
mirage3–13-0.0423%1 May
ancient12–16-0.0018%30 Apr
mirage8–130.0221%29 Apr
cache13–70.0724%29 Apr
cache13–70.1056%28 Apr
dust213–11-0.0118%27 Apr
mirage7–130.0329%27 Apr
dust22–13-0.0043%26 Apr
anubis13–90.0226%24 Apr
mirage19–170.0526%24 Apr
mirage13–60.0840%24 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0414%24 Apr
ancient5–13-0.0720%23 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0130%22 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0236%22 Apr
overpass13–40.1033%21 Apr
ancient13–90.0755%20 Apr
anubis13–80.0322%20 Apr
overpass2–13-0.0936%20 Apr
overpass13–00.0724%20 Apr
mirage9–130.0019%20 Apr
anubis13–110.0247%20 Apr
inferno9–130.0426%19 Apr
anubis13–110.0526%18 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0138%16 Apr
nuke7–13-0.0421%16 Apr
mirage15–150.0128%14 Apr
mirage13–50.0540%13 Apr
mirage4–130.0323%13 Apr
ancient13–110.0117%11 Apr
anubis13–110.1232%11 Apr
anubis13–110.0615%9 Apr
mirage13–40.1334%8 Apr
mirage13–80.0816%8 Apr
anubis13–70.0425%5 Apr
ancient13–70.0333%5 Apr
mirage17–190.0419%4 Apr
dust27–13-0.0747%3 Apr
anubis11–130.0225%2 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0231%1 Apr
overpass13–60.0343%30 Mar
mirage8–130.0333%29 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0123%29 Mar
dust213–10.0533%28 Mar
dust213–60.0229%26 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0329%26 Mar
dust213–50.0956%22 Mar
dust213–40.0933%22 Mar
dust213–100.0524%21 Mar
mirage13–50.0935%20 Mar
dust213–110.0232%20 Mar
office13–4-0.0130%19 Mar
office13–70.0530%19 Mar
mirage13–40.0023%17 Mar
dust213–110.0432%16 Mar
dust213–160.0026%15 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →