Bullets — CS2 Stats

76561197963346722[U:1:3080994]Steam profile ↗

2,798Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 Solid

Premier CS Rating20,333Pink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11253 of 28839 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning49

Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateLLWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression6.2

Utility6.8

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels3.4

Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning4.9

Utility6.8

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels3.4

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time636ms+20ms

first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms

Headshot accuracy16.1%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–5

13–0Biggest win — inferno

8Longest win streak

L2Current streak

12–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 77% over 13ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	35	21–14	60%	-0.01
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.01
inferno	S	13	10–3	77%	0.02
cache	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.01
anubis	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
ancient	C	7	3–4	43%	-0.01
nuke	—	3	1–2	33%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,677Matches

50%Win rate

0.97Avg K/D

76.8ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	43	47%	1.02	14.3
Dust2	23	61%	1.33	14.4
Nuke	18	72%	0.95	13.9
Inferno	16	38%	0.84	14.7
Ancient	14	43%	0.97	13.9
Anubis	11	55%	1.20	14.6
Overpass	6	50%	1.09	15.0
Cache	6	67%	1.45	16.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

75.9%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

636msReaction time

35.0%T opening success

52.4%CT opening success

0.58Enemies flashed / flash

11.5%Flash assists

13.91HE damage / grenade

9.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.0197% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	-0.02	7%	29 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	21%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	24%	29 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.00	21%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.00	10%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	27%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	17%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	21%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.15	18%	27 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.03	23%	27 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	21%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	11%	26 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	14%	26 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	10%	25 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.05	14%	24 Aug →
inferno	2–13	0.00	11%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	11%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.00	14%	23 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.04	15%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	10%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	20%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	14%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	11%	18 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.10	21%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.04	21%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.00	12%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	15%	11 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.05	24%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.06	22%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.06	15%	10 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.05	10%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.00	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.00	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.12	25%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	15%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.08	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	20–22	0.08	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.03	12%	5 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.02	16%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	19%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	16%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.05	20%	3 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.02	23%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.01	16%	31 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	13%	31 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.01	13%	30 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.05	12%	30 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	22%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	23%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.11	33%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–6	-0.03	17%	24 Jul →
dust2	2–7	0.10	7%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	14%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.02	15%	24 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	18%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	9%	23 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.00	28%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	10%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.01	18%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	16%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	14%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.07	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.09	11%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	16%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	11%	19 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.01	20%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–0	-0.00	0%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–0	0.00	18%	18 Jul →
cache	8–4	0.09	18%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.02	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.03	33%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.14	10%	18 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	6%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	24%	17 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	11%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	14%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	5%	15 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.01	12%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.16	12%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.03	13%	15 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	14%	14 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	16%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	13%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	41%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	14%	13 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.02	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	-0.08	13%	13 Jul →