✓ beyond the wheel — CS2 Stats

76561197962926077[U:1:2660349]

857Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidHybrid Rifler

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning61

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55–45Last 10055%Win rateLLLLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2

Aggression5.3

Utility4.7

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning6.1

Utility4.7

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time615ms+19ms

first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 615ms

Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.9%

first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — mirage 1–0

13–1Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

L7Current streak

8–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	42	24–18	57%	0.01
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.02
anubis	D	13	4–9	31%	-0.03
dust2	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
nuke	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.03
cache	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
inferno	—	2	2–0	100%	0.04
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

755Matches

55%Win rate

1.24Avg K/D

77.2ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	231	52%	1.11	15.7
Dust2	105	49%	1.12	16.4
Ancient	62	52%	1.11	14.8
Inferno	37	62%	1.31	17.6
Anubis	22	45%	0.96	13.4
Nuke	15	53%	0.99	14.6
Train	8	50%	1.28	16.4
Overpass	3	33%	0.89	11.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.2%Spray accuracy

82.1%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

614msReaction time

25.7%T opening success

53.2%CT opening success

0.55Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

6.88HE damage / grenade

8.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6901% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	11–13	-0.02	21%	28 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	16%	14 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.03	19%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	16–19	0.02	17%	11 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	23%	5 Aug →
cache	14–16	0.02	19%	4 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.05	32%	4 Aug →
mirage	12–1	0.10	27%	1 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.00	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	19%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.06	33%	22 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	15%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	22%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	25%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	26%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.02	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	17%	20 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.05	41%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.00	15%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	26%	6 Jun →
overpass	13–9	0.03	26%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.10	21%	5 Jun →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	15%	5 Jun →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	41%	5 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.02	25%	4 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.03	16%	1 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.03	25%	31 May →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	26%	14 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.02	14%	13 May →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	20%	13 May →
mirage	13–6	0.03	20%	13 May →
mirage	13–5	0.03	23%	10 May →
dust2	3–13	0.02	23%	10 May →
dust2	14–16	0.01	22%	7 May →
dust2	0–5	-0.09	33%	7 May →
mirage	13–6	0.11	22%	6 May →
dust2	10–13	0.05	21%	6 May →
dust2	16–13	0.06	19%	5 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	24%	2 May →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	24%	2 May →
anubis	10–13	0.01	32%	1 May →
dust2	13–2	0.01	8%	1 May →
anubis	2–13	-0.02	29%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–2	0.04	34%	29 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	16%	29 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.01	24%	27 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.00	18%	26 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	12%	26 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.06	26%	26 Apr →
nuke	16–14	-0.07	6%	26 Apr →
ancient	11–13	-0.09	7%	26 Apr →
mirage	13–1	0.13	15%	26 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	13%	26 Apr →
nuke	11–13	-0.07	14%	25 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	21%	25 Apr →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	17%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–2	0.01	17%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	20%	25 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.03	18%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	17%	25 Apr →
anubis	1–13	-0.10	9%	25 Apr →
mirage	13–6	0.03	14%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	13%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.03	23%	24 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	25%	24 Apr →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	21%	23 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	10%	23 Apr →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	23%	23 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	13%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.02	14%	22 Apr →
anubis	13–3	-0.02	19%	22 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.07	25%	22 Apr →
ancient	13–6	0.06	19%	20 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.05	14%	19 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	21%	19 Apr →
mirage	7–13	0.05	22%	19 Apr →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	19%	19 Apr →
nuke	13–7	0.00	11%	18 Apr →
ancient	9–13	0.03	15%	18 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	14%	18 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.06	21%	18 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	24%	17 Apr →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	15%	13 Apr →
ancient	13–2	-0.03	16%	12 Apr →
ancient	13–8	0.03	22%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.01	10%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.10	24%	4 Apr →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	16%	3 Apr →
mirage	1–0	0.19	50%	2 Apr →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	18%	2 Apr →
ancient	10–13	0.02	13%	2 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.01	16%	2 Apr →
ancient	13–7	0.05	27%	1 Apr →
anubis	1–10	-0.13	0%	1 Apr →
ancient	13–1	0.04	34%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	27%	30 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.02	22%	30 Mar →
ancient	13–3	0.08	15%	30 Mar →