AXONZ

AXONZ — CS2 Stats

US76561197961968224[U:1:1702496]Steam profile ↗

208Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 Developing
Premier CS Rating21,598Pink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7324 of 21661 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAXONZFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,598 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim36
Positioning52
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56368Last 10056%Win rateLWLWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.6
Aggression6.5
Utility4.7
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 711ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.6
Positioning5.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.09
first ⅓ avg 0.07 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time725ms+69ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 725ms
Headshot accuracy21.8%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — dust2 16–5
164Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
25Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 50% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A38211755%0.05
mirageB168850%0.03
infernoS128467%0.02
cacheA117464%0.02
nukeA74357%-0.05
ancient4040%-0.05
overpass41325%0.02
train43175%0.06
anubis330100%-0.02
vertigo110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

330Matches
57%Win rate
1.43Avg K/D
82.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
26.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.2%Spray accuracy
77.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
711msReaction time
26.9%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
6.91HE damage / grenade
7.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Settings

    Slow first shots are as often a setup problem as a reflex one — framerate, sensitivity and crosshair visibility all move this number.

    Reaction time 710.7156ms — above the 700ms mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.9231% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0319%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0633%30 Jul
cache6–13-0.1017%30 Jul
cache13–100.0231%29 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0918%29 Jul
dust213–50.0030%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0521%27 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0519%26 Jul
mirage13–110.0213%26 Jul
cache4–13-0.0332%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0614%26 Jul
mirage13–20.0223%26 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0319%26 Jul
cache5–13-0.067%26 Jul
cache13–60.0719%24 Jul
dust29–30.0014%23 Jul
dust213–60.0316%23 Jul
nuke13–90.0417%23 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0617%21 Jul
overpass13–50.1020%14 Nov
overpass2–130.0129%5 Nov
overpass6–13-0.1024%28 Oct
dust213–50.0227%28 Oct
nuke2–9-0.197%26 Oct
mirage7–13-0.0611%22 Oct
dust213–6-0.014%25 Apr
dust29–13-0.0523%25 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0918%24 Apr
nuke1–13-0.1233%19 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0841%18 Apr
mirage8–130.0128%16 Apr
vertigo8–2-0.0350%8 Apr
inferno9–40.0926%7 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0611%6 Apr
inferno5–9-0.1018%6 Apr
inferno13–7-0.0222%24 Jun
ancient1–60.0136%29 Apr
nuke12–120.0118%23 Mar
overpass15–150.0718%3 Apr
dust26–16-0.0118%2 Apr
dust211–16-0.0618%25 Mar
cache9–7-0.0720%22 Mar
cache9–60.0816%21 Mar
dust29–5-0.0614%21 Mar
mirage9–60.0127%17 Mar
cache7–90.0416%13 Mar
dust29–10.1018%13 Mar
dust28–80.1317%13 Mar
inferno9–40.0727%12 Mar
inferno16–70.0117%10 Mar
train8–00.0625%10 Mar
inferno15–150.0726%9 Mar
cache9–40.1610%9 Mar
inferno9–60.0512%9 Mar
dust29–70.1420%9 Mar
train9–5-0.038%9 Mar
cache9–60.0420%8 Mar
dust22–90.0115%8 Mar
mirage6–9-0.0511%8 Mar
dust216–40.0317%7 Mar
mirage8–00.0813%7 Mar
dust29–3-0.0120%7 Mar
inferno9–50.0422%6 Mar
dust215–150.0827%6 Mar
dust216–110.1013%5 Mar
dust27–160.0418%5 Mar
dust216–80.1214%4 Mar
dust29–60.0918%3 Mar
mirage9–00.1428%3 Mar
dust29–50.1015%27 Feb
dust29–16-0.0215%25 Feb
dust211–160.0722%23 Feb
mirage11–160.0619%23 Feb
mirage6–90.0217%21 Feb
mirage1–9-0.0323%20 Feb
dust215–150.1122%20 Feb
dust27–90.0629%20 Feb
mirage9–7-0.0112%19 Feb
mirage16–60.0826%18 Feb
dust28–80.1325%18 Feb
dust22–110.1026%18 Feb
dust216–70.0523%17 Feb
inferno16–11-0.0119%17 Feb
train4–90.1015%17 Feb
dust25–9-0.037%17 Feb
dust28–80.0316%17 Feb
inferno3–9-0.0517%16 Feb
mirage9–20.1222%16 Feb
train16–110.1022%16 Feb
dust29–40.1418%16 Feb
dust29–160.0626%16 Feb
dust216–50.1920%16 Feb
dust29–40.0522%15 Feb
dust29–30.1322%15 Feb
inferno16–90.1018%15 Feb
cache16–90.0821%15 Feb
mirage3–90.0315%15 Feb
mirage9–160.0525%15 Feb
dust216–110.1132%15 Feb
nuke16–140.0123%14 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →