Log1x — CS2 Stats

76561197961428742[U:1:1163014]

950Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,829Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.6% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61

Positioning35

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–46–3Last 10051%Win rateWWLWLLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1

Aggression2.7

Utility4.6

Positioning3.5

Opening Duels1.8

Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1

Positioning3.5

Utility4.6

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time606ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms

Headshot accuracy17.3%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — mirage 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

W2Current streak

9–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	25	14–11	56%	0.00
mirage	B	22	10–12	45%	-0.00
cache	S	14	10–4	71%	0.01
inferno	C	14	6–8	43%	-0.01
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.03
nuke	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.02
boulder	—	1	1–0	100%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

61Matches

52%Win rate

0.92Avg K/D

75.4ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	14	64%	0.99	15.4
Mirage	13	46%	0.74	14.2
Cache	9	56%	1.10	13.4
Anubis	9	44%	0.75	12.4
Ancient	7	57%	1.00	14.0
Inferno	6	50%	1.06	15.8
Nuke	2	50%	0.86	16.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.0%Spray accuracy

79.2%Counter-strafing

10.2°Preaim

609msReaction time

27.3%T opening success

46.8%CT opening success

0.60Enemies flashed / flash

4.8%Flash assists

8.12HE damage / grenade

7.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–9	0.00	22%	29 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.04	20%	29 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.09	19%	28 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.08	14%	28 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.14	23%	23 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	17%	23 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	29%	22 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	19%	22 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	18%	22 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	8%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.01	14%	22 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.06	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.02	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	20%	18 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	19%	18 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	19%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	15%	17 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.07	12%	17 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	19%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.04	12%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.07	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.06	18%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	30%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	17%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.05	12%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	15%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	11%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.05	22%	12 Aug →
mirage	18–22	-0.01	15%	11 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	16%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	22%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.04	21%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	13%	9 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.06	9%	9 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.11	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.10	22%	9 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.07	18%	8 Aug →
dust2	4–13	0.04	36%	8 Aug →
mirage	4–13	0.03	21%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.08	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.31	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	15%	8 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.03	16%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	24%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	28%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	15%	8 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.08	5%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.01	25%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	8%	7 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	20%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	10%	3 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.04	27%	3 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.05	10%	3 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	22%	3 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	26%	3 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.01	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.00	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	23%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.01	30%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	20%	2 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	17%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	23%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.08	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	25%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	13%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	20%	1 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	17%	1 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.05	27%	1 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	30%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	26%	31 Jul →
inferno	3–13	-0.01	18%	31 Jul →
ancient	7–13	0.03	12%	31 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	22%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	16%	31 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	15%	31 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	26%	30 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.03	26%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	13%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	31%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.03	16%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.03	10%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	23%	28 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.02	14%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	15%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	22%	27 Jul →
boulder	6–0	0.07	22%	27 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.02	18%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.14	17%	27 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.03	18%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	28%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	12%	27 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.03	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	13%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	15%	26 Jul →