DrMaybee

DrMaybee — CS2 Stats

CA76561197961279369[U:1:1013641]Steam profile ↗

4,517Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 Learning
Premier CS Rating12,374Blue band · top ~42.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10031 of 14235 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrMaybeeFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER12,374 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning47
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41554Last 10041%Win rateLWLLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression4.9
Utility5.8
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 565ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.7
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time566ms−44ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.06Best rating — dust2 8–0
130Biggest win — dust2
3Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C35132237%-0.05
ancientB21101148%-0.04
cacheC2191243%-0.05
nukeC94544%-0.03
infernoD92722%-0.04
anubisA53260%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
44%Win rate
0.75Avg K/D
ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1164%0.669.9
Nuke1050%0.8513.3
Anubis1020%0.7413.6
Overpass560%0.8211.2
Ancient425%0.6910.8
Mirage10%0.5310.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
66.1%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
565msReaction time
25.4%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
12.05HE damage / grenade
7.99Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.3933% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient4–13-0.0811%28 Aug
cache13–2-0.0233%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0419%28 Aug
cache10–13-0.095%28 Aug
cache9–13-0.057%27 Aug
anubis13–11-0.048%27 Aug
dust213–9-0.075%27 Aug
cache13–160.0123%26 Aug
dust25–13-0.0639%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0117%25 Aug
ancient13–4-0.0412%23 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0021%23 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0015%23 Aug
dust21–13-0.1325%23 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0418%23 Aug
cache13–10-0.0710%22 Aug
cache13–1-0.0215%22 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0011%22 Aug
inferno4–13-0.118%22 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0114%22 Aug
dust216–14-0.0817%22 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0519%22 Aug
dust28–13-0.0613%21 Aug
cache6–130.0221%21 Aug
cache14–16-0.1011%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0524%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0115%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0017%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0117%20 Aug
cache13–10-0.0723%19 Aug
dust213–60.0121%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.1015%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0518%18 Aug
dust213–7-0.0112%18 Aug
dust25–13-0.117%17 Aug
cache6–13-0.0510%17 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0010%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0527%16 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0911%15 Aug
ancient12–7-0.0811%15 Aug
dust25–13-0.0919%15 Aug
ancient13–60.0211%15 Aug
dust28–00.0629%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0418%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0313%15 Aug
nuke9–130.0116%14 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0419%14 Aug
cache7–13-0.0920%14 Aug
nuke13–40.0117%14 Aug
inferno13–2-0.0229%14 Aug
dust213–5-0.0226%14 Aug
ancient3–13-0.109%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.084%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0522%13 Aug
dust213–00.0521%13 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0819%13 Aug
dust213–11-0.0716%13 Aug
cache13–5-0.0517%12 Aug
dust211–13-0.0618%12 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0725%12 Aug
dust213–10-0.0119%11 Aug
dust213–5-0.0617%10 Aug
dust23–13-0.1011%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.035%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.076%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.025%8 Aug
dust28–13-0.0738%8 Aug
cache13–8-0.0728%8 Aug
dust213–16-0.0510%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0616%8 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0221%8 Aug
ancient11–13-0.066%8 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0322%8 Aug
dust211–13-0.0422%7 Aug
inferno5–13-0.029%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.077%7 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0615%7 Aug
cache15–15-0.054%7 Aug
dust211–13-0.0022%6 Aug
cache15–15-0.0519%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0616%5 Aug
dust213–7-0.0419%5 Aug
cache10–13-0.0813%5 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0212%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0425%4 Aug
nuke13–110.0112%4 Aug
dust212–12-0.057%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0517%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0510%3 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0823%2 Aug
cache13–80.0117%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0510%2 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0550%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0418%1 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0416%1 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0610%1 Aug
cache4–13-0.0113%1 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0223%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0513%31 Jul
cache13–7-0.0329%31 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →