ol1monopoly — CS2 Stats

76561197961197893[U:1:932165]✓ No bans

2,726Tracked matches50%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2205 of 13652 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,810 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGol1monopolyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,810 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning42
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47521Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression3.0
Utility5.5
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 39% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning4.2
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time553ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–3
121Biggest win — dust2
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31161552%-0.01
mirageB30141647%-0.02
ancientB147750%-0.03
infernoD92722%-0.02
nukeD62433%-0.04
anubisS54180%-0.05
cacheC52340%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

522Matches
51%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
79.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16252%1.0716.6
Dust215154%1.0615.9
Ancient6841%0.9514.1
Nuke4551%1.0015.8
Anubis3853%0.9515.0
Inferno3253%0.9213.8
Overpass1362%1.0217.3
Train1040%1.0216.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.5%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
550msReaction time
17.0%T opening success
39.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.1%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
8.12Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.0456% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust21–13-0.0224%28 Aug
dust21–13-0.0945%28 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0023%28 Aug
dust213–30.0318%27 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0331%27 Aug
dust25–13-0.0422%27 Aug
cache5–13-0.0116%27 Aug
dust213–11-0.0131%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.0021%25 Aug
inferno10–130.0116%25 Aug
dust24–1-0.0013%25 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0528%24 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0310%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0815%24 Aug
dust212–10.0433%23 Aug
mirage13–80.1018%23 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0133%22 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0310%22 Aug
dust29–13-0.0227%21 Aug
cache2–13-0.1010%21 Aug
mirage20–22-0.0416%20 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0632%20 Aug
inferno13–110.0119%20 Aug
dust212–16-0.0333%20 Aug
mirage13–6-0.009%20 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0416%19 Aug
dust213–20.0314%19 Aug
dust213–100.0226%19 Aug
nuke13–16-0.067%18 Aug
ancient13–4-0.076%18 Aug
dust213–30.1422%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0120%18 Aug
dust213–110.0412%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0511%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0322%16 Aug
nuke13–100.0311%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0519%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0217%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0512%13 Aug
dust20–13-0.1033%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0917%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0126%13 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0220%13 Aug
nuke4–13-0.1116%12 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0213%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0713%9 Aug
anubis13–7-0.038%9 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0623%9 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0719%8 Aug
ancient4–13-0.039%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0118%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0815%7 Aug
anubis13–3-0.048%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.1211%7 Aug
mirage6–13-0.069%7 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1113%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.0815%6 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0415%6 Aug
ancient7–130.0011%5 Aug
dust213–100.0216%5 Aug
dust25–13-0.0715%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0512%4 Aug
dust213–9-0.0316%4 Aug
dust27–13-0.0520%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0325%30 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0514%30 Jul
mirage8–13-0.108%29 Jul
inferno16–140.0215%29 Jul
ancient16–140.0210%28 Jul
mirage15–19-0.0219%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.068%27 Jul
dust213–160.0221%27 Jul
mirage6–130.0118%27 Jul
mirage16–140.0217%27 Jul
dust216–120.0314%26 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0210%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0317%26 Jul
cache13–8-0.0613%24 Jul
cache8–13-0.0211%24 Jul
dust210–13-0.0420%24 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0211%23 Jul
mirage10–13-0.027%23 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0324%23 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0417%23 Jul
anubis13–7-0.047%22 Jul
dust213–6-0.0413%21 Jul
ancient13–20.0116%21 Jul
dust215–15-0.0019%21 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0115%20 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0012%20 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0610%18 Jul
mirage13–4-0.0321%18 Jul
dust213–90.0121%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.015%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.0217%17 Jul
mirage9–130.0114%17 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0442%17 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0527%16 Jul
mirage13–100.0120%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0114%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →