keRSe — CS2 Stats

76561197961026094[U:1:760366]

2,552Tracked matches42%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating9,425Light Blue band · top ~57.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11006 of 14887 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 848 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

9,999Peak Premier on CSDB
848Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 848
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 53 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 574 below peak (9,999)
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 575 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkeRSeFACEITLevel 3 · 848 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER9,425 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO848csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning44
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44506Last 10044%Win rateLLTWWLWLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.6
Aggression5.1
Utility4.8
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning4.4
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact2.4

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time600ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 637ms → last ⅓ avg 600ms
Headshot accuracy18.4%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–6
132Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 56% over 18mirageWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C2191243%-0.03
nukeA1810856%0.00
mirageD1861233%-0.02
infernoC156940%-0.00
ancientC125742%-0.01
anubisB84450%-0.04
cacheB84450%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

105Matches
47%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
72.6ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3148%0.8913.3
Inferno2348%0.8112.9
Dust21650%0.8413.3
Ancient1164%0.8714.4
Nuke933%0.8313.1
Overpass729%0.8213.0
Train450%0.8713.8
Anubis425%0.8213.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.1%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
79.8%Counter-strafing
12.2°Preaim
603msReaction time
29.9%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
9.32Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.1952° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.0717%28 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0112%28 Aug
dust215–15-0.0113%27 Aug
nuke13–40.0614%27 Aug
dust213–7-0.0220%27 Aug
inferno8–130.0527%27 Aug
mirage13–50.0526%27 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0212%26 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0511%25 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0914%24 Aug
dust213–60.0228%23 Aug
inferno15–150.0919%23 Aug
nuke13–60.0819%23 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0118%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0424%22 Aug
dust214–160.0124%22 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0714%21 Aug
mirage1–13-0.039%21 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0513%20 Aug
inferno13–50.0218%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0419%20 Aug
ancient9–130.0616%20 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0110%20 Aug
anubis9–13-0.067%19 Aug
nuke13–50.0124%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0318%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.129%18 Aug
nuke12–16-0.1033%18 Aug
cache13–20.0235%18 Aug
mirage13–50.0623%18 Aug
nuke10–130.0027%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0617%18 Aug
dust213–100.0117%17 Aug
inferno7–130.0217%17 Aug
dust213–30.0329%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0619%17 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0413%17 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0616%17 Aug
dust213–10-0.0113%16 Aug
inferno10–13-0.1217%16 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0418%16 Aug
cache5–13-0.0615%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0119%16 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0115%15 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0113%15 Aug
nuke13–90.0313%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0427%15 Aug
dust24–13-0.1011%15 Aug
ancient13–5-0.048%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0512%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.037%13 Aug
dust211–13-0.0621%13 Aug
cache13–50.0311%13 Aug
dust213–3-0.0015%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0814%12 Aug
dust27–13-0.0129%11 Aug
dust213–9-0.0318%10 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0115%10 Aug
inferno13–70.0017%10 Aug
inferno4–13-0.1016%10 Aug
dust26–13-0.083%9 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0116%9 Aug
ancient13–80.0328%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0311%8 Aug
ancient13–40.0212%8 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0212%8 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0215%8 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0614%8 Aug
mirage7–130.0216%7 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0117%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0615%7 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0150%7 Aug
cache13–4-0.0420%7 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0724%7 Aug
dust211–130.0130%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0134%6 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0316%6 Aug
nuke13–60.1324%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0616%6 Aug
dust213–7-0.0317%6 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0115%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0319%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0018%5 Aug
cache7–13-0.0527%5 Aug
cache5–13-0.0326%5 Aug
cache13–11-0.0814%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.0916%4 Aug
dust215–15-0.0515%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0827%4 Aug
mirage10–130.0119%4 Aug
inferno13–50.0116%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0219%4 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0722%4 Aug
inferno13–70.0417%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0419%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0221%3 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0022%3 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0811%30 Jul
nuke13–110.0724%30 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0226%30 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →