dRuNkeN*MoNk_36 — CS2 Stats

76561197960878334[U:1:612606]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,408Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport

Premier CS Rating12,804Blue band · top ~40% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#16236 of 23553 tracked

FaceitLevel 2 · 730 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51

Positioning31

Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–45–6Last 10049%Win rateLWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +60pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim5.1

Aggression3.6

Utility7.3

Positioning3.1

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 650ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1

Positioning3.1

Utility7.3

Mechanics5.8

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact8.6

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time652ms−68ms

first ⅓ avg 720ms → last ⅓ avg 652ms

Headshot accuracy15.8%+2.5%

first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — inferno 9–1

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 11% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	29	15–14	52%	-0.01
cache	A	16	9–7	56%	-0.02
inferno	S	15	10–5	67%	0.01
mirage	C	15	6–9	40%	-0.04
vertigo	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
dust2	D	9	1–8	11%	-0.02
ancient	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,590Matches

48%Win rate

0.93Avg K/D

65.1ADR

32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	82	51%	0.94	12.8
Ancient	51	59%	0.97	12.6
Nuke	44	45%	0.87	12.8
Inferno	41	54%	0.90	13.8
Dust2	26	35%	0.78	10.6
Vertigo	10	50%	0.98	14.0
Anubis	8	50%	0.94	13.4
Overpass	5	40%	0.99	14.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.9%Headshot accuracy

38.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

39.7%Spray accuracy

76.0%Counter-strafing

13.1°Preaim

650msReaction time

19.2%T opening success

39.7%CT opening success

0.73Enemies flashed / flash

2.9%Flash assists

11.52HE damage / grenade

13.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 13.1185° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →
Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.8608% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	3–13	0.04	13%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.01	15%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.04	11%	27 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.01	16%	27 Aug →
cache	9–1	0.03	17%	27 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.02	6%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.07	16%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.02	9%	25 Aug →
nuke	4–0	0.02	100%	25 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.06	27%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	9%	24 Aug →
vertigo	4–13	-0.01	18%	23 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.02	8%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.06	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	9%	21 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	0%	20 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	17%	20 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	12%	20 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	14%	18 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	7%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–2	0.17	18%	15 Aug →
cache	16–14	-0.04	14%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.13	15%	14 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	9%	14 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.04	5%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	7%	14 Aug →
vertigo	13–10	-0.01	18%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	11%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.01	14%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	23%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.01	19%	13 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	13%	12 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.06	7%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.03	11%	11 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.02	4%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	32%	11 Aug →
nuke	1–7	-0.03	13%	11 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.06	3%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	11%	10 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	10%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	5%	10 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.11	7%	10 Aug →
vertigo	5–13	0.02	12%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.02	14%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.05	10%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	11%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	9%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.06	7%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	15%	6 Aug →
mirage	12–12	-0.05	25%	5 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.10	7%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	30%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–5	0.15	10%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	11%	4 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.03	30%	4 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.08	7%	4 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.07	7%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–1	0.18	12%	3 Aug →
vertigo	9–5	0.10	15%	3 Aug →
nuke	1–9	-0.24	0%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	12%	3 Aug →
cache	3–3	-0.14	0%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.10	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.07	26%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.04	3%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.03	20%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	12%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	11%	31 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.09	10%	30 Jul →
vertigo	13–5	0.01	0%	29 Jul →
vertigo	10–13	0.04	10%	27 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.07	12%	26 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	24%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–9	0.07	5%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	17%	26 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.03	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.03	13%	25 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	13%	25 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.04	16%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.06	19%	22 Jul →
nuke	12–12	-0.07	33%	22 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.01	12%	21 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	23%	19 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.09	0%	19 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	13%	19 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	9%	19 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	13%	18 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	0.00	19%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	9%	16 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.07	4%	16 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	17%	16 Jul →
nuke	8–8	-0.05	5%	15 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	6%	15 Jul →