FreezYp0pJ3FF — CS2 Stats

76561197960670852[U:1:405124]

3,248Tracked matches43%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 Developing
Premier CS Rating17,935Purple band · top ~16.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10285 of 19077 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,343 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

17,222Peak Premier on CSDB
1,343Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,343
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 8 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 17,935
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,065 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFreezYp0pJ3FFFACEITLevel 7 · 1,343 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER17,935 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,343csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning58
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWWLWWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.7
Aggression6.4
Utility5.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time591ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–9
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 14anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29161355%0.01
anubisD1551033%-0.01
ancientA149564%-0.00
mirageA149564%0.01
cacheA117464%-0.01
infernoC104640%-0.01
nukeC73443%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

226Matches
51%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
79.6ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25758%0.9714.9
Ancient3549%0.9114.1
Anubis3462%0.9514.3
Mirage3339%0.7814.3
Cache2548%0.9315.7
Inferno2245%0.8815.6
Nuke1040%1.0716.1
Overpass560%0.9112.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
32.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.2%Spray accuracy
74.1%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
579msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
60.5%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.4%Flash assists
13.84HE damage / grenade
6.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1563% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–70.0423%28 Aug
anubis13–80.0618%28 Aug
ancient6–13-0.1112%28 Aug
dust213–70.0829%28 Aug
mirage13–50.0527%28 Aug
dust211–130.0322%28 Aug
cache4–13-0.0710%28 Aug
dust213–8-0.0121%28 Aug
dust211–130.0223%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0015%28 Aug
inferno13–70.0013%28 Aug
cache13–7-0.0314%27 Aug
dust24–13-0.0517%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0612%27 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0516%26 Aug
ancient10–130.0112%26 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0028%26 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0630%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0626%24 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0521%24 Aug
dust213–90.0723%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0319%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0323%23 Aug
anubis3–130.0214%23 Aug
cache13–7-0.059%21 Aug
anubis10–13-0.1116%21 Aug
dust213–50.0123%21 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0317%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0426%21 Aug
anubis4–130.0121%21 Aug
dust211–13-0.0113%21 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0318%21 Aug
cache13–30.0220%20 Aug
dust28–13-0.0617%20 Aug
mirage13–30.0017%20 Aug
dust213–9-0.0212%20 Aug
ancient13–80.0217%20 Aug
dust213–80.0519%20 Aug
mirage13–10.0526%20 Aug
anubis5–13-0.058%19 Aug
dust213–80.0219%19 Aug
nuke13–80.0123%19 Aug
anubis11–130.0012%18 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0623%18 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0423%18 Aug
dust213–90.0613%18 Aug
mirage13–90.0426%18 Aug
dust213–11-0.0220%18 Aug
ancient16–140.0119%18 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0314%18 Aug
dust213–30.0327%18 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0017%18 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0215%17 Aug
dust213–30.0519%16 Aug
dust213–60.0426%16 Aug
cache8–13-0.0219%16 Aug
anubis6–13-0.069%15 Aug
ancient13–90.1512%15 Aug
dust210–130.0431%15 Aug
mirage13–50.0619%15 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0311%15 Aug
cache6–130.1216%15 Aug
inferno13–70.079%15 Aug
inferno5–9-0.078%15 Aug
inferno7–90.0112%15 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0521%15 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0316%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.069%15 Aug
anubis13–80.0120%15 Aug
cache13–2-0.059%15 Aug
dust215–150.1113%15 Aug
nuke9–130.0023%14 Aug
ancient13–70.0726%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0218%14 Aug
dust22–00.000%14 Aug
dust28–130.0322%14 Aug
dust26–130.0119%14 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0415%14 Aug
cache9–13-0.0126%14 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0712%12 Aug
dust213–20.0716%12 Aug
dust213–8-0.1419%11 Aug
inferno10–13-0.039%9 Aug
ancient16–14-0.057%9 Aug
dust214–16-0.0427%9 Aug
cache13–40.0619%9 Aug
dust213–100.0321%9 Aug
mirage13–10.0813%9 Aug
cache13–10-0.0221%9 Aug
inferno13–70.0324%8 Aug
dust26–13-0.0726%8 Aug
anubis16–120.0022%6 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0423%6 Aug
anubis5–130.0418%4 Aug
dust212–16-0.0123%4 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0110%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0712%2 Aug
nuke13–70.0210%2 Aug
anubis13–100.0431%1 Aug
dust29–13-0.0710%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →