ChambaKillZ

ChambaKillZ — CS2 Stats

76561197960441870[U:1:176142]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,098Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChambaKillZFACEITLevel 9 · 1,871 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning46
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression4.0
Utility5.5
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.6
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy20.5%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 7–9
133Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 9mirageWeakest map · 44% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B1991047%-0.00
mirageC167944%-0.00
anubisB158753%-0.03
cacheB105550%-0.01
ancientS96367%0.01
nukeS97278%0.06
infernoA95456%-0.00
officeA85363%0.02
poseidon220100%0.11
overpass21150%-0.01
eldorado110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,284Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
79.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust229349%1.0916.2
Mirage27849%1.1116.1
Ancient13556%1.0916.8
Anubis10151%1.0414.7
Inferno9246%1.1415.6
Overpass6955%1.0716.6
Nuke5951%1.2118.0
Cache4846%0.9815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.5%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
575msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
7.72HE damage / grenade
10.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.7177% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–16-0.0524%27 Aug
ancient19–160.0320%26 Aug
nuke13–60.0232%26 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0122%22 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0325%21 Aug
mirage10–130.0014%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0724%18 Aug
dust213–110.0731%16 Aug
mirage13–70.0520%16 Aug
nuke13–60.0115%15 Aug
dust214–16-0.0230%15 Aug
inferno13–80.0618%15 Aug
dust213–110.0715%11 Aug
dust213–100.0210%11 Aug
cache13–90.0125%10 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0112%10 Aug
mirage8–130.0531%10 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0418%10 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0314%10 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0116%10 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0427%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0917%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0027%10 Aug
dust29–13-0.0217%9 Aug
dust27–13-0.0627%9 Aug
cache13–9-0.0211%9 Aug
anubis12–16-0.0533%9 Aug
mirage10–130.0317%8 Aug
cache6–130.0115%7 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0321%7 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0120%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0325%5 Aug
dust24–13-0.065%4 Aug
cache16–19-0.0426%4 Aug
dust213–4-0.0026%4 Aug
anubis16–13-0.0710%4 Aug
inferno1–13-0.1013%4 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0215%4 Aug
anubis13–110.0126%3 Aug
inferno13–70.0524%3 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0716%2 Aug
dust22–13-0.065%2 Aug
anubis7–130.0427%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0211%2 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0328%2 Aug
cache9–130.0320%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0621%1 Aug
ancient22–19-0.0518%1 Aug
ancient10–130.0729%31 Jul
nuke13–40.1336%31 Jul
mirage13–100.0119%31 Jul
dust211–13-0.0118%31 Jul
nuke7–90.2029%31 Jul
office12–30.1247%31 Jul
anubis13–90.0317%30 Jul
cache13–11-0.0315%30 Jul
ancient19–17-0.0124%30 Jul
dust217–19-0.0612%29 Jul
inferno8–8-0.0117%28 Jul
poseidon9–30.1425%28 Jul
nuke13–80.0121%27 Jul
dust28–130.0434%27 Jul
dust26–13-0.0427%27 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0321%27 Jul
cache7–130.0127%26 Jul
dust216–130.0425%26 Jul
office13–5-0.0214%23 Jul
office13–50.0324%22 Jul
eldorado9–50.0317%22 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0819%19 Jul
nuke16–130.0021%18 Jul
dust213–30.0522%18 Jul
cache13–5-0.0028%18 Jul
inferno7–130.0433%16 Jul
mirage13–100.1018%16 Jul
dust213–6-0.0435%15 Jul
poseidon9–50.0726%15 Jul
office9–130.0628%15 Jul
office13–60.0922%14 Jul
dust211–130.0221%14 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0119%14 Jul
ancient13–110.0322%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0715%13 Jul
ancient16–140.0522%12 Jul
mirage13–60.0337%12 Jul
dust213–80.0136%11 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0231%11 Jul
mirage13–16-0.0121%10 Jul
dust213–9-0.0326%10 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0234%5 Jul
nuke13–50.1132%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.0429%2 Jul
office8–13-0.0618%30 Jun
office10–13-0.0126%30 Jun
anubis13–90.0219%30 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0032%25 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0321%25 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0021%25 Jun
overpass5–130.0226%22 Jun
office13–6-0.0333%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →