NIPSEN

NIPSEN — CS2 Stats

VA76561197960428391[U:1:162663]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,726Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,986Purple band · top ~24.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#29689 of 52251 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,400 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNIPSENFACEITLevel 7 · 1,400 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,986 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning42
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49447Last 10049%Win rateLLWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression2.7
Utility6.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning4.2
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time597ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — dust2 13–1
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 100% over 8infernoWeakest map · 38% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C31131842%0.00
infernoC26101638%0.01
anubisA169756%0.00
nukeB137654%-0.00
ancientS880100%0.03
mirage31233%-0.01
cache21150%0.02
poseidon1010%0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

620Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
78.2ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno14152%1.1115.5
Anubis11551%1.1316.1
Dust28845%1.0215.7
Ancient7749%1.1416.7
Mirage6152%1.0013.8
Nuke5751%1.1517.1
Vertigo2143%1.0515.8
Train1953%1.1516.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.3%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
597msReaction time
21.6%T opening success
33.2%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
9.81HE damage / grenade
7.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5565% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0514%3 Jun
inferno1–13-0.0918%2 Jun
inferno13–60.0126%2 Jun
inferno8–130.0318%1 Jun
ancient13–110.1127%1 Jun
dust28–130.0530%1 Jun
anubis13–90.0516%31 May
dust213–8-0.0320%31 May
inferno13–40.0613%29 May
dust213–7-0.0323%29 May
ancient13–100.0115%27 May
dust212–16-0.0123%27 May
ancient13–11-0.0113%26 May
dust29–130.0125%25 May
inferno13–50.049%25 May
dust27–13-0.0129%25 May
dust213–11-0.0122%25 May
anubis5–13-0.0320%24 May
inferno7–13-0.0110%24 May
mirage9–13-0.0215%24 May
dust213–2-0.0115%24 May
inferno15–150.0127%22 May
nuke9–13-0.0328%21 May
dust217–190.0121%19 May
dust213–8-0.0116%19 May
anubis13–9-0.0325%17 May
cache13–50.0313%17 May
nuke13–9-0.0523%17 May
inferno11–13-0.0214%17 May
inferno13–60.0325%16 May
inferno13–11-0.0123%16 May
anubis8–130.0316%15 May
dust213–90.0613%15 May
nuke9–00.1320%14 May
poseidon8–80.1224%14 May
inferno9–5-0.0757%14 May
nuke13–40.0411%14 May
nuke13–8-0.0010%14 May
anubis13–9-0.0412%14 May
dust27–13-0.0718%14 May
dust213–20.0421%14 May
inferno13–5-0.0227%14 May
nuke10–13-0.0226%13 May
dust213–70.0344%12 May
inferno11–13-0.0124%12 May
inferno11–130.0128%11 May
ancient13–7-0.0122%11 May
dust29–13-0.0220%11 May
anubis15–150.0414%10 May
nuke13–10-0.0021%10 May
inferno5–13-0.0320%10 May
nuke10–13-0.0321%10 May
inferno14–160.0116%9 May
nuke5–13-0.0717%9 May
mirage16–140.0220%8 May
dust29–13-0.0424%8 May
anubis16–14-0.0313%7 May
nuke13–100.0519%6 May
anubis4–13-0.0832%6 May
inferno10–130.0217%5 May
anubis9–13-0.0021%5 May
inferno3–130.0123%4 May
dust210–130.0619%4 May
inferno13–100.0224%2 May
dust23–13-0.1115%30 Apr
dust28–13-0.0822%29 Apr
cache12–120.0119%29 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0321%28 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0524%28 Apr
anubis13–40.0518%27 Apr
dust213–10.1625%27 Apr
ancient13–60.0617%26 Apr
dust23–13-0.0215%26 Apr
anubis13–60.0513%26 Apr
dust210–130.0215%26 Apr
anubis13–16-0.048%23 Apr
inferno13–20.0519%23 Apr
dust216–130.0317%22 Apr
inferno3–90.1326%22 Apr
anubis13–110.0518%21 Apr
dust28–130.0113%21 Apr
inferno2–130.0016%20 Apr
dust27–130.0211%20 Apr
ancient16–140.0419%20 Apr
anubis13–110.0311%19 Apr
inferno13–60.0718%19 Apr
dust215–150.0216%19 Apr
dust216–13-0.0128%18 Apr
ancient13–60.109%18 Apr
inferno15–15-0.0227%18 Apr
dust211–13-0.0734%17 Apr
anubis10–130.0214%17 Apr
dust28–13-0.0432%16 Apr
inferno15–150.0322%16 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0222%16 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0114%15 Apr
dust213–90.0432%15 Apr
inferno8–130.0126%14 Apr
nuke13–70.0513%14 Apr
dust213–80.0424%13 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →