buk-_^ — CS2 Stats

CA76561197960371986[U:1:106258]Steam profile ↗

242Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,100Purple band · top ~28% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7534 of 11645 tracked

FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning69

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateWWWWLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression10.0

Utility4.1

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels4.9

Clutch9.4

Strong CT-side openerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 625ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning6.9

Utility4.1

Mechanics8.4

Opening Duels4.9

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.04

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.04

Reaction time598ms−31ms

first ⅓ avg 629ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms

Headshot accuracy24.6%−0.1%

first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — ancient 13–0

13–0Biggest win — nuke

9Longest win streak

W4Current streak

5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16dust2Weakest map · 35% over 31

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	31	11–20	35%	0.02
mirage	S	22	15–7	68%	0.02
ancient	S	16	12–4	75%	0.04
cache	S	10	7–3	70%	0.03
nuke	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00
anubis	A	5	3–2	60%	0.00
inferno	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
overpass	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.00
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

11Matches

64%Win rate

1.37Avg K/D

90.7ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

67%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	100%	1.25	16.0
Inferno	1	100%	1.70	17.0
Dust2	1	100%	1.19	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy

32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

30.2%Spray accuracy

87.8%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

625msReaction time

38.6%T opening success

60.4%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

5.6%Flash assists

5.66HE damage / grenade

5.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.6312% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–2	0.08	21%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.10	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.16	32%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.13	33%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	25%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.10	24%	23 Jul →
ancient	9–5	-0.07	18%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.08	49%	23 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.00	22%	23 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.06	36%	23 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.02	18%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.11	25%	21 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.02	19%	17 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	24%	16 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.01	15%	16 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	32%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–0	0.10	14%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	30%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.24	32%	15 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	23%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	15%	15 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.00	0%	14 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.03	26%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.16	34%	13 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.05	14%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	22%	11 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.03	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.00	20%	9 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.06	35%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.02	33%	9 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	22%	9 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.07	36%	9 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	23%	8 Jul →
cache	10–5	0.05	36%	8 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	24%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	17%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	26%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	34%	5 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.11	30%	5 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.03	11%	3 Jul →
ancient	11–8	0.02	30%	3 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.04	28%	2 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	17%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.04	20%	30 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	30 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	19%	26 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	14%	26 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	26%	25 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.08	33%	24 Jun →
overpass	10–13	-0.05	11%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.01	18%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–4	0.04	19%	24 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	24%	24 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.11	23%	24 Jun →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	20%	23 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	29%	23 Jun →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	29%	23 Jun →
mirage	9–13	0.03	21%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.04	28%	23 Jun →
anubis	1–13	-0.01	18%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.06	36%	23 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.14	36%	23 Jun →
overpass	13–11	0.06	26%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.08	55%	20 Jun →
dust2	5–13	0.02	28%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.00	16%	19 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.10	27%	19 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.07	15%	19 Jun →
mirage	13–7	0.16	38%	12 Jun →
ancient	3–13	0.00	21%	12 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	24%	9 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	14%	29 Oct →
overpass	7–13	-0.06	9%	6 Oct →
dust2	8–13	-0.09	24%	5 Oct →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	36%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	22%	5 Oct →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	7%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–8	-0.05	24%	28 Sept →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	24%	28 Sept →
inferno	2–7	0.04	39%	28 Sept →
nuke	16–12	-0.00	38%	28 Sept →
nuke	4–13	0.00	0%	28 Sept →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	21%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–9	0.03	27%	28 Sept →
dust2	15–15	-0.00	24%	28 Sept →
overpass	3–13	0.04	34%	2 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	40%	20 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	20%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	23%	20 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	37%	20 Aug →
train	13–5	0.02	24%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	22%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.01	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	42%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	24%	13 Aug →
train	5–13	-0.04	12%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	34%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.04	24%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.12	29%	31 Jul →