aya — CS2 Stats

76561197960288800[U:1:23072]✓ No bans

2,492Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,563Pink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#5938 of 16805 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

21,563Peak Premier on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,563
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,437 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGayaPREMIER21,563 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning35
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47449Last 10047%Win rateLLWWWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression4.7
Utility6.7
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.3

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning3.5
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time670ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 670ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–8
130Biggest win — fachwerk
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 10dust2Weakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB157847%-0.02
anubisC135838%0.00
infernoA106460%-0.02
shelterA106460%-0.01
fachwerkA95456%-0.03
ancientA74357%-0.03
dust2D61517%-0.04
nukeB63350%-0.01
mirageB63350%-0.05
boulderB63350%-0.05
overpass3030%-0.02
train31233%-0.04
office21150%-0.02
vertigo21150%0.02
italy21150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
657msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
40.4%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
11.17HE damage / grenade
11.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.7973% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache6–13-0.0711%22 Aug
dust22–13-0.0715%22 Aug
ancient13–10-0.046%21 Aug
dust213–30.0224%21 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0212%21 Aug
cache5–13-0.0629%21 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0915%18 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0226%18 Aug
ancient13–20.0219%16 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0718%16 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0515%14 Aug
cache13–8-0.0312%14 Aug
cache5–130.0015%14 Aug
cache10–13-0.0515%13 Aug
nuke13–90.0634%13 Aug
nuke15–150.0718%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0032%11 Aug
inferno13–3-0.039%11 Aug
inferno7–130.0322%11 Aug
ancient13–30.0629%9 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0623%9 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0315%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0630%7 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0514%7 Aug
shelter13–8-0.0122%2 Aug
fachwerk2–13-0.0425%2 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0414%2 Aug
cache13–50.0112%2 Aug
shelter13–9-0.0425%30 Jul
office4–13-0.0019%30 Jul
dust22–13-0.0816%30 Jul
office13–3-0.0422%28 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0414%28 Jul
shelter13–10-0.0220%28 Jul
vertigo10–13-0.0516%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0120%27 Jul
dust23–13-0.0529%27 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0531%27 Jul
cache13–70.0130%26 Jul
anubis13–70.0114%26 Jul
overpass12–12-0.0320%22 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0830%22 Jul
shelter11–13-0.0222%22 Jul
cache2–13-0.0414%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0924%22 Jul
anubis12–12-0.0517%22 Jul
fachwerk13–9-0.0826%21 Jul
shelter8–130.0638%21 Jul
train2–13-0.1022%21 Jul
boulder13–8-0.0224%21 Jul
overpass6–130.0216%21 Jul
italy5–13-0.1116%21 Jul
cache9–13-0.0117%21 Jul
anubis12–120.0112%15 Jul
shelter12–120.0628%15 Jul
cache10–13-0.069%15 Jul
anubis13–80.1513%14 Jul
shelter12–12-0.0117%14 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0916%14 Jul
boulder6–13-0.0832%14 Jul
fachwerk9–13-0.0122%14 Jul
fachwerk13–00.0430%13 Jul
boulder13–3-0.0217%13 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0414%13 Jul
cache13–11-0.0614%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0628%12 Jul
ancient0–8-0.07100%12 Jul
anubis13–70.0631%12 Jul
cache13–70.0532%12 Jul
fachwerk5–13-0.0822%11 Jul
shelter13–9-0.1015%11 Jul
boulder9–13-0.0316%11 Jul
fachwerk13–60.0315%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0320%11 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0318%10 Jul
shelter13–8-0.0322%10 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0114%10 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0521%10 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0625%10 Jul
boulder7–13-0.0815%9 Jul
shelter13–10-0.0130%9 Jul
boulder13–6-0.0520%9 Jul
fachwerk13–60.0115%9 Jul
inferno13–50.0515%8 Jul
train9–13-0.0613%8 Jul
italy13–6-0.0125%8 Jul
dust212–120.0326%8 Jul
train13–60.0423%6 Jul
cache13–6-0.0213%6 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0519%5 Jul
inferno13–110.0025%5 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0314%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0116%1 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0918%1 Jul
vertigo8–10.0926%1 Jul
anubis13–30.1115%1 Jul
cache13–5-0.0512%1 Jul
ancient13–6-0.017%30 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0812%30 Jun
anubis12–120.0522%30 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →