← Back to Matches
AnubisMap 1
AncientMap 2
Like what you see? Place your bets on live CS2 matches.Bet on This Match →
Map Results
AnubisMap 1W
FlyQuest
FlyQuestW–L
L
DEPO
DEPODuration: 43:37
AncientMap 2WFlyQuest
FlyQuestW–L
LDEPO
DEPODuration: 47:26
Streams
Map Breakdown
Series best: Vexite — 1.45 average rating across 2 maps.
Ancient
FlyQuest 13–9 DEPOFlyQuest1st half 8 · 2nd half 5CT 8/12 · T 5/10Pistols 0/2
DEPO1st half 4 · 2nd half 5CT 5/10 · T 4/12Pistols 2/2
| Player | K | D | A | +/− | ADR | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSFlyQuest | 19 | 12 | 8 | +7 | 86.0 | 64% | 1.28 |
| jksFlyQuest | 16 | 13 | 3 | +3 | 73.5 | 73% | 1.25 |
| busterDEPO | 16 | 17 | 7 | -1 | 88.3 | 73% | 1.20 |
| VexiteFlyQuest | 14 | 14 | 9 | +0 | 96.2 | 77% | 1.16 |
| shoxsDEPO | 20 | 18 | 4 | +2 | 82.5 | 55% | 1.16 |
| aliStairFlyQuest | 20 | 16 | 5 | +4 | 80.2 | 82% | 1.15 |
| wetfyDEPO | 18 | 16 | 3 | +2 | 74.1 | 68% | 1.07 |
| nettikFlyQuest | 15 | 11 | 5 | +4 | 69.1 | 77% | 1.03 |
| KradDEPO | 7 | 17 | 5 | -10 | 41.0 | 64% | 0.69 |
| sh1seidoDEPO | 4 | 17 | 7 | -13 | 51.0 | 55% | 0.48 |
Anubis
FlyQuest 13–6 DEPOFlyQuest1st half 9 · 2nd half 4CT 4/7 · T 9/12Pistols 1/2
DEPO1st half 3 · 2nd half 3CT 3/12 · T 3/7Pistols 1/2
| Player | K | D | A | +/− | ADR | KAST | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VexiteFlyQuest | 21 | 13 | 4 | +8 | 104.2 | 84% | 1.74 |
| nettikFlyQuest | 14 | 10 | 8 | +4 | 89.4 | 84% | 1.41 |
| aliStairFlyQuest | 16 | 12 | 3 | +4 | 82.5 | 79% | 1.29 |
| shoxsDEPO | 15 | 17 | 6 | -2 | 89.0 | 68% | 1.08 |
| INSFlyQuest | 9 | 12 | 7 | -3 | 70.5 | 79% | 1.07 |
| jksFlyQuest | 13 | 14 | 2 | -1 | 62.4 | 74% | 1.02 |
| sh1seidoDEPO | 11 | 15 | 4 | -4 | 63.5 | 74% | 0.90 |
| wetfyDEPO | 14 | 14 | 1 | +0 | 66.8 | 63% | 0.88 |
| KradDEPO | 11 | 13 | 6 | -2 | 64.4 | 74% | 0.77 |
| busterDEPO | 7 | 14 | 6 | -7 | 44.7 | 68% | 0.48 |
About FlyQuest vs DEPO
This BO3 Counter-Strike 2 match is part of Playoffs on the IEM circuit. FlyQuest took the series 2–0. For head-to-head form and predicted lineups, see the head-to-head tool and the prediction model.