Phil — CS2 Stats

DE76561199871626740[U:1:1911361012]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

185Tracked matches43%Win rate2026Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,052Purple band · top ~24.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#21244 of 36672 tracked

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,053 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning33

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–47–6Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3

Aggression4.8

Utility4.1

Positioning3.3

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Counter-strafing. 93% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 50 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning3.3

Utility4.1

Mechanics9.5

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03

Reaction time562ms−59ms

first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms

Headshot accuracy24.8%−0.5%

first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–5

13–1Biggest win — dust2

3Longest win streak

L3Current streak

10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.03
mirage	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.01
dust2	S	16	11–5	69%	-0.00
anubis	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.04
inferno	A	11	6–5	55%	-0.03
ancient	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.01
nuke	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

23Matches

48%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

85.5ADR

49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

23%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	9	33%	0.92	15.4
Mirage	7	57%	1.28	19.7
Ancient	3	33%	1.35	22.3
Cache	2	50%	1.50	17.5
Nuke	1	100%	1.33	20.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.4%Spray accuracy

92.6%Counter-strafing

8.6°Preaim

581msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

37.6%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

5.92HE damage / grenade

4.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3409% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	5–13	-0.05	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	27%	15 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	19%	15 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.08	31%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.06	21%	14 Aug →
ancient	2–1	-0.05	0%	14 Aug →
cache	0–8	-0.07	60%	14 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.00	47%	12 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	20%	10 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	16%	10 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.01	20%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	32%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	27%	7 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	33%	7 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	18%	6 Aug →
mirage	12–16	-0.08	24%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.07	24%	4 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	28%	3 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.06	16%	2 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	29%	2 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	50%	29 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	16%	26 Jul →
cache	4–13	0.03	35%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.02	16%	19 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	29%	19 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.07	24%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.00	11%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	17%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.02	28%	18 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.02	26%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	21%	18 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	22%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	-0.03	33%	17 Jul →
mirage	16–14	0.05	23%	17 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	22%	17 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.00	26%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	29%	17 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.05	50%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.04	16%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.23	22%	16 Jul →
dust2	2–6	0.06	40%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	25%	12 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.03	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	23%	12 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	16%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.07	23%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	-0.01	31%	12 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	21%	12 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	11%	12 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.01	35%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	29%	11 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.03	21%	5 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.07	24%	3 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.01	33%	2 Jul →
ancient	15–15	-0.05	21%	26 Jun →
mirage	0–13	-0.11	13%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.05	21%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–5	0.01	39%	26 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.00	16%	25 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.09	31%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–10	0.07	33%	24 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.06	28%	24 Jun →
inferno	13–1	0.01	38%	24 Jun →
cache	13–11	-0.03	38%	23 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	23%	23 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.06	18%	18 Jun →
cache	10–13	-0.02	34%	18 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	30%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–1	-0.01	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	31%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	21%	14 Jun →
ancient	15–15	-0.03	24%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.08	11%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–5	-0.02	28%	14 Jun →
ancient	15–15	0.01	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	23%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–8	-0.08	50%	14 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.13	20%	14 Jun →
inferno	3–10	-0.05	53%	13 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.05	18%	13 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.00	21%	13 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.06	29%	13 Jun →
overpass	16–12	-0.02	36%	13 Jun →
mirage	13–1	-0.03	38%	13 Jun →
cache	13–3	-0.01	23%	13 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	26%	13 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	31%	12 Jun →
nuke	9–13	0.01	32%	7 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.00	28%	7 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.03	22%	7 Jun →
nuke	3–13	-0.07	24%	7 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.12	15%	6 Jun →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	17%	6 Jun →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	7%	6 Jun →
overpass	13–6	-0.08	9%	6 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	38%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	21%	6 Jun →