tahmkroos — CS2 Stats

76561199497170686[U:1:1536904958]Steam profile ↗

1,395Tracked matches62%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,229Pink band · top ~8.2% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning36

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–43–4Last 10053%Win rateWWWLLTLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2

Aggression4.4

Utility5.9

Positioning3.6

Opening Duels0.1

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning3.6

Utility5.9

Mechanics4.5

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time532ms−31ms

first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 532ms

Headshot accuracy12.0%+0.4%

first ⅓ avg 11.6% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — anubis 13–4

13–1Biggest win — office

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10cacheWeakest map · 29% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	21	8–13	38%	0.01
mirage	A	18	11–7	61%	0.01
ancient	A	15	9–6	60%	0.03
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	0.03
nuke	S	10	7–3	70%	0.05
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
cache	D	7	2–5	29%	-0.01
office	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches

80%Win rate

0.85Avg K/D

59.4ADR

25%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	2	100%	0.88	11.0
Nuke	1	0%	0.72	13.0
Inferno	1	100%	0.69	11.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.07	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.7%Headshot accuracy

40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.9%Spray accuracy

70.3%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

529msReaction time

23.4%T opening success

37.4%CT opening success

0.53Enemies flashed / flash

1.9%Flash assists

7.92HE damage / grenade

14.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 11.747% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 23.3808% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
office	13–5	0.00	45%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.04	19%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	10%	24 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.03	11%	24 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	3%	24 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	13%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	2%	22 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.08	6%	22 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.02	6%	22 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.03	12%	22 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.09	15%	22 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.06	9%	22 Aug →
office	13–1	0.13	16%	22 Aug →
office	6–0	0.08	17%	22 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.04	8%	21 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.09	23%	21 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.06	5%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.04	15%	21 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.00	15%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.05	13%	21 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	8%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	9%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.07	12%	12 Aug →
dust2	0–6	-0.02	5%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.09	3%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.07	22%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.00	8%	8 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.00	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.02	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.04	6%	8 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	9%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.01	13%	3 Aug →
office	9–13	0.04	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.17	0%	2 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	11%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.03	16%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.12	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.00	11%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.15	10%	2 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	7%	2 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	4%	2 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.01	14%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.04	4%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.04	15%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.08	15%	2 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.02	8%	2 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.03	10%	2 Aug →
cache	3–13	0.02	12%	30 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.08	18%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	13%	30 Jul →
office	13–10	-0.01	8%	30 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	7%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.01	16%	29 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	2%	29 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	15%	29 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.00	7%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	13%	27 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	11%	27 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	17%	27 Jul →
office	4–13	-0.03	9%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	9%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.10	17%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	5%	25 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	22%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.07	6%	25 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	5%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.13	9%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	3%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.08	15%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.06	11%	23 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	3%	23 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	2%	23 Jul →
nuke	10–1	0.03	5%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	3%	20 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	12%	20 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.05	11%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.02	17%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.00	7%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	16%	18 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	12%	18 Jul →
inferno	2–13	0.04	4%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.13	10%	18 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.02	9%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.10	8%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	17 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.06	11%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.11	21%	16 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.06	18%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.04	4%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.13	11%	16 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.02	13%	15 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.05	31%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.07	27%	15 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.08	13%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.05	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	9%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	18%	12 Jul →