Ich1zoku

Ich1zoku — CS2 Stats

JP76561199176457613[U:1:1216191885]Steam profile ↗1 game ban

794Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,729Top 50% of 44,590 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16224 of 57067 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,522 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIch1zokuFACEITLevel 9 · 1,522 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,729 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning44
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51454Last 10051%Win rateWWWWLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.9
Utility5.3
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.4
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time506ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 545ms → last ⅓ avg 506ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−5.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — anubis 13–5
130Biggest win — dust2
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 52ancientWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A52312160%-0.01
ancientC1881044%-0.01
anubisB147750%-0.02
mirageC94544%-0.02
cache3030%-0.03
inferno2020%-0.01
nuke21150%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

534Matches
52%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
70.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210561%1.1415.1
Mirage6149%0.9613.2
Ancient5444%0.8312.9
Anubis4854%0.9914.7
Nuke2055%1.2217.4
Inferno1540%0.8113.0
Overpass1267%1.1615.3
Train978%1.2314.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
77.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
497msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
29.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
12.07HE damage / grenade
6.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1527% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–11-0.0312%29 Aug
dust213–10.0611%28 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0617%28 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0522%28 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0619%28 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0420%28 Aug
anubis8–130.0015%28 Aug
ancient16–190.0016%28 Aug
dust213–80.0227%27 Aug
ancient9–130.0117%27 Aug
dust213–40.0417%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0727%26 Aug
anubis13–16-0.016%26 Aug
dust24–13-0.0429%26 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0510%26 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0614%26 Aug
dust27–13-0.1019%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0212%20 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1112%20 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0411%20 Aug
dust213–4-0.0623%20 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0412%20 Aug
cache9–13-0.0429%19 Aug
anubis13–50.1227%19 Aug
ancient5–130.0114%19 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0224%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0632%18 Aug
dust219–16-0.0223%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.0422%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0623%18 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0421%17 Aug
dust210–130.0326%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0221%17 Aug
ancient20–22-0.0435%15 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0124%15 Aug
inferno10–130.0536%15 Aug
ancient13–2-0.0018%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0716%15 Aug
nuke5–1-0.0411%15 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0831%15 Aug
ancient5–00.1063%15 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0826%15 Aug
anubis13–30.0221%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0421%14 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0229%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.0723%14 Aug
dust213–60.0432%14 Aug
dust213–100.0138%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0246%14 Aug
dust213–30.0442%14 Aug
dust28–130.0339%14 Aug
dust213–20.0731%14 Aug
dust219–150.0020%12 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0619%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.049%11 Aug
ancient13–70.0219%11 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0232%11 Aug
dust213–50.0226%11 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0739%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.066%8 Aug
dust29–1-0.0633%7 Aug
mirage13–80.0422%7 Aug
anubis13–110.0218%7 Aug
dust213–50.0120%7 Aug
dust213–11-0.0021%7 Aug
dust26–13-0.0117%6 Aug
dust211–13-0.0417%6 Aug
dust22–130.0223%6 Aug
dust24–130.0327%6 Aug
mirage2–70.0110%5 Aug
ancient9–130.0525%5 Aug
dust212–12-0.0518%5 Aug
dust212–120.0119%5 Aug
dust211–13-0.0814%5 Aug
dust28–13-0.0430%5 Aug
anubis5–130.0322%5 Aug
dust213–80.0233%5 Aug
anubis13–3-0.0226%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0438%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0320%4 Aug
dust213–40.0236%4 Aug
dust213–10-0.0035%4 Aug
dust212–12-0.0231%3 Aug
dust213–10.0934%3 Aug
cache9–13-0.0630%3 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0028%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0317%3 Aug
dust213–8-0.0318%3 Aug
dust213–50.0220%3 Aug
dust213–00.0338%3 Aug
cache6–130.0021%3 Aug
dust213–90.0029%2 Aug
dust213–10-0.0427%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0815%2 Aug
dust212–120.0916%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0514%2 Aug
dust213–40.0020%2 Aug
dust25–00.0114%2 Aug
dust25–130.0025%1 Aug
dust22–13-0.0820%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →