Gothenburg

Gothenburg — CS2 Stats

SZ76561199154724960[U:1:1194459232]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

647Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,135Purple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23768 of 55118 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGothenburgFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,135 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning50
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50464Last 10050%Win rateLWLLLWWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.6
Aggression4.9
Utility3.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.0
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time594ms−27ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 594ms
Headshot accuracy21.7%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–4
130Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 89% over 9cacheWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28131546%-0.01
dust2B178947%-0.02
cacheC146843%-0.01
infernoB126650%-0.01
nukeB105550%-0.01
ancientS98189%0.04
anubisB84450%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.02
boulder1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
75%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
69.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1173%1.4811.8
Dust25100%1.1813.8
Inferno333%1.1316.7
Anubis2100%1.4413.0
Train250%0.8913.0
Ancient1100%0.9415.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.9%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
595msReaction time
31.0%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
4.87HE damage / grenade
8.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.0331% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo2–9-0.0230%24 Aug
dust213–9-0.0427%24 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0829%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0022%6 Aug
boulder7–12-0.0038%6 Aug
mirage13–60.0614%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0813%3 Aug
dust213–6-0.0521%28 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0325%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0029%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0220%23 Jul
inferno8–10.1026%23 Jul
nuke4–13-0.1111%23 Jul
cache10–30.0429%23 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0417%22 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1120%21 Jul
dust211–13-0.0216%21 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0119%21 Jul
mirage13–50.0326%21 Jul
inferno13–60.0123%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0334%20 Jul
mirage16–120.0417%20 Jul
mirage15–150.0023%20 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0524%20 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0821%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.1227%20 Jul
ancient15–150.0214%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0319%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0614%20 Jul
cache9–13-0.0431%20 Jul
anubis15–150.027%20 Jul
inferno16–120.0115%20 Jul
ancient13–00.1014%20 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0616%20 Jul
cache6–13-0.0020%20 Jul
dust213–110.0220%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0515%20 Jul
mirage5–130.0020%20 Jul
dust25–13-0.0416%19 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0421%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0319%19 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0333%19 Jul
cache10–13-0.0315%19 Jul
ancient13–90.1111%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0613%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.039%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0224%18 Jul
cache7–13-0.0236%18 Jul
inferno6–130.0713%16 Jul
dust23–13-0.0619%16 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0128%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0326%16 Jul
dust213–10-0.0025%15 Jul
dust213–10.0740%15 Jul
dust211–130.0520%15 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0615%15 Jul
nuke13–70.0016%15 Jul
inferno6–13-0.099%15 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0517%15 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0522%15 Jul
anubis13–90.0118%15 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0013%14 Jul
cache13–80.0119%14 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0421%14 Jul
cache13–40.0023%14 Jul
mirage13–90.0015%14 Jul
cache14–16-0.0414%14 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0216%14 Jul
dust210–13-0.0611%14 Jul
nuke13–40.1426%14 Jul
mirage16–130.0616%13 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0521%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.1116%12 Jul
mirage13–80.0110%12 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0317%12 Jul
ancient13–30.0112%12 Jul
cache13–60.0731%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0524%12 Jul
mirage7–130.049%12 Jul
ancient16–13-0.0214%12 Jul
ancient13–00.1410%12 Jul
cache13–70.0113%12 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0319%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0546%11 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0318%11 Jul
dust211–130.0320%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0215%11 Jul
dust213–4-0.0116%11 Jul
inferno9–130.0215%11 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0441%11 Jul
dust213–9-0.0837%11 Jul
nuke0–9-0.0933%11 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0567%11 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0119%10 Jul
nuke13–70.0422%10 Jul
cache13–6-0.0122%10 Jul
dust23–130.0219%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0118%10 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0310%10 Jul
mirage13–80.0438%10 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →