Jurpies — CS2 Stats

76561199105173761[U:1:1144908033]

1,466Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating22,146Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4449 of 13747 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning53

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–45–2Last 10053%Win rateLLLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression4.9

Utility5.6

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels0.9

Clutch2.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning5.3

Utility5.6

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels0.9

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time572ms−18ms

first ⅓ avg 590ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms

Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–1

13–0Biggest win — inferno

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8cacheWeakest map · 27% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	31	17–14	55%	0.01
cache	D	15	4–11	27%	-0.00
ancient	S	13	9–4	69%	0.03
dust2	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.02
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	0.04
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.02
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.01
office	—	2	2–0	100%	0.01
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

277Matches

51%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

86.5ADR

54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	83	48%	1.20	17.7
Ancient	28	43%	1.05	18.2
Anubis	27	41%	1.17	17.6
Inferno	22	68%	1.21	16.4
Vertigo	21	67%	1.26	18.8
Nuke	19	58%	1.13	18.7
Overpass	18	50%	1.03	14.8
Dust2	16	38%	1.09	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.2%Headshot accuracy

33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.6%Spray accuracy

68.7%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

569msReaction time

31.2%T opening success

35.7%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

7.98HE damage / grenade

10.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.2036% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	1–13	-0.08	16%	17 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	19%	15 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	25%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	21%	15 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	22%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.04	33%	15 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.02	21%	15 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	21%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.04	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	19%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.06	20%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	15%	15 Aug →
vertigo	10–13	-0.01	20%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	39%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.11	19%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.04	29%	13 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.01	32%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.04	27%	13 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.11	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	28%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	30%	13 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	34%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	15%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	20%	13 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	14%	13 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	15%	13 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.00	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.03	24%	13 Aug →
cache	10–1	0.05	12%	13 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.07	18%	13 Aug →
cache	13–1	0.02	31%	13 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.08	14%	13 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	19%	13 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.02	11%	13 Aug →
office	13–8	0.03	21%	13 Aug →
office	13–7	0.00	21%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.01	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	26%	13 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	41%	10 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	20%	10 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.02	29%	10 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.03	23%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.01	24%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.05	29%	10 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.02	26%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.04	27%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.09	29%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.15	19%	10 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.06	29%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.02	17%	9 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.13	17%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	2 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.08	16%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	31%	1 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	23%	1 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.01	23%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	1 Aug →
inferno	8–1	0.02	10%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	33%	1 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	15%	1 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	30%	1 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.02	20%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	27%	27 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	18%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	10%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	23%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–2	-0.03	24%	27 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.05	16%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.07	34%	27 Jul →
mirage	0–13	-0.04	25%	27 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	19%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.03	22%	27 Jul →
mirage	2–13	0.02	15%	27 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.01	24%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.06	17%	27 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.00	11%	27 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.07	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.05	18%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	25%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.04	21%	26 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.02	20%	26 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.03	17%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.11	16%	26 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.03	23%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.14	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	14%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.10	22%	26 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.03	26%	26 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	18%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	27%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	15%	25 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.01	25%	25 Jul →