La_hutter 666 (sutmand)

La_hutter 666 (sutmand) — CS2 Stats

76561199083587250[U:1:1123321522]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,553Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,717Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#4072 of 14084 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,434 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLa_hutter 666 (sutmand)FACEITLevel 10 · 2,434 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,717 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning52
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53407Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1
Aggression6.3
Utility3.4
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.8
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.2
Utility3.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time639ms+26ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy22.8%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 22.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — anubis 12–12
131Biggest win — anubis
4Longest win streak
155In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 10cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA22121055%0.00
nukeB1991047%0.03
infernoB158753%0.02
dust2A106460%-0.01
ancientA106460%0.03
anubisS108280%0.03
cacheD62433%0.02
poseidon3030%-0.03
overpass21150%-0.02
train1010%-0.04
shelter110100%0.06
vertigo1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

478Matches
55%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
81.9ADR
54%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12650%1.0416.2
Inferno7961%1.0516.9
Ancient6764%1.1116.3
Dust25643%0.9716.3
Anubis5254%1.0516.6
Nuke4663%1.1815.2
Train2268%1.1216.2
Vertigo1553%1.1515.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
639msReaction time
25.2%T opening success
49.0%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
7.30HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2314% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.0416%28 Aug
ancient13–160.0434%26 Aug
mirage13–100.0224%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0427%18 Aug
dust26–13-0.0617%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0020%8 Aug
cache8–13-0.0410%8 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0515%8 Aug
nuke13–30.0622%8 Aug
mirage13–16-0.0713%6 Aug
mirage16–140.0123%5 Aug
anubis13–60.0213%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0423%4 Aug
ancient13–40.0823%4 Aug
nuke14–16-0.0226%2 Aug
inferno11–13-0.1136%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0417%31 Jul
cache7–130.0626%30 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0027%30 Jul
train6–13-0.0417%30 Jul
inferno13–30.1527%30 Jul
mirage10–130.1019%29 Jul
dust213–70.0135%28 Jul
anubis13–50.0128%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0326%28 Jul
ancient13–110.0821%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0213%26 Jul
inferno13–100.0334%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0527%20 Jul
cache4–70.0628%19 Jul
anubis13–10.0723%18 Jul
shelter13–110.0627%14 Jul
dust23–13-0.0417%12 Jul
cache13–60.0126%12 Jul
dust213–11-0.0125%10 Jul
nuke9–130.0421%7 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0221%7 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0513%7 Jul
mirage2–8-0.0038%7 Jul
cache10–130.0424%17 Jun
dust29–13-0.0123%17 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0025%13 Jun
dust211–13-0.0830%12 Jun
dust213–80.0529%12 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0418%11 Jun
ancient4–130.0631%11 Jun
vertigo7–130.0528%9 Jun
anubis13–40.0331%9 Jun
nuke13–60.0021%8 Jun
nuke5–130.0535%6 Jun
inferno13–160.0326%4 Jun
cache13–11-0.0114%3 Jun
mirage9–10.0211%2 Jun
nuke10–130.0723%2 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0220%1 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0022%31 May
mirage10–13-0.0136%31 May
inferno4–13-0.0416%31 May
mirage13–11-0.0429%31 May
mirage8–130.0343%26 May
dust213–50.0415%26 May
nuke9–13-0.0132%24 May
nuke10–130.0319%24 May
mirage13–110.0432%24 May
mirage14–16-0.0229%24 May
mirage13–80.0027%24 May
ancient15–150.0118%24 May
ancient9–13-0.0213%24 May
mirage13–80.0422%24 May
nuke13–90.0337%23 May
inferno13–80.0823%23 May
overpass6–13-0.0516%23 May
inferno5–13-0.0419%22 May
inferno15–150.0021%22 May
nuke13–110.0527%22 May
dust213–9-0.0319%22 May
ancient3–00.010%22 May
nuke13–60.0520%22 May
mirage15–150.0218%21 May
anubis7–20.0830%15 May
nuke9–130.0925%13 May
anubis13–6-0.0023%12 May
anubis4–13-0.0625%12 May
nuke8–130.0415%12 May
anubis13–11-0.0312%11 May
inferno16–13-0.0223%3 May
ancient13–9-0.0013%1 May
nuke16–12-0.0025%27 Apr
nuke15–150.0118%26 Apr
nuke8–20.1440%24 Apr
anubis12–120.2331%24 Mar
ancient13–10-0.0322%15 Mar
inferno13–50.0133%20 Feb
poseidon8–80.0626%20 Feb
ancient13–80.1114%19 Feb
inferno9–50.1344%15 Feb
inferno6–130.0018%15 Feb
inferno9–70.0822%15 Feb
poseidon8–8-0.0448%15 Feb
poseidon2–9-0.1131%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →