Cheburashka

Cheburashka — CS2 Stats

76561199031466125[U:1:1071200397]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

766Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 Developing
Premier CS Rating7,817Light Blue band · top ~65.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21827 of 29076 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCheburashkaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER7,817 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning57
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateWLLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.0
Aggression9.3
Utility2.1
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.7
Utility2.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time658ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 700ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — nuke 13–11
130Biggest win — overpass
8Longest win streak
137In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
vertigoA30181260%0.02
nukeA1810856%0.01
ancientC1771041%-0.02
overpassA95456%0.03
anubisC94544%-0.01
infernoA85363%-0.01
mirageA74357%-0.01
dust221150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

714Matches
50%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
67.8ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Vertigo11753%1.2716.5
Nuke7256%1.1516.5
Inferno6349%0.9914.7
Ancient6037%0.8714.0
Anubis4652%1.0814.5
Mirage4445%0.9213.3
Overpass3158%1.1214.0
Dust21540%0.9915.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
81.2%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
666msReaction time
32.4%T opening success
59.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
7.07Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.4062% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–50.0415%28 Aug
dust210–13-0.0515%28 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0815%21 Apr
nuke7–130.0212%25 Jan
vertigo13–110.0829%19 Jan
ancient16–12-0.0119%13 Jan
dust213–100.0423%13 Jan
ancient4–130.0729%9 Nov
nuke13–100.0220%9 Nov
vertigo16–120.1015%30 Oct
ancient13–110.1112%24 Oct
vertigo9–6-0.0320%22 Oct
vertigo13–80.0314%7 Oct
overpass13–00.1638%11 Sept
nuke13–110.2024%11 Sept
overpass13–110.0611%4 Sept
vertigo14–16-0.1017%28 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0216%24 Jul
inferno8–80.01100%1 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0823%8 Jun
vertigo2–80.036%24 May
anubis9–13-0.0115%24 Apr
overpass13–60.0217%21 Mar
anubis13–60.069%28 Feb
vertigo11–13-0.0210%28 Feb
ancient9–13-0.059%28 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0623%28 Feb
vertigo14–16-0.0112%27 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0213%27 Feb
anubis7–13-0.0412%27 Feb
vertigo13–80.0610%27 Feb
nuke13–40.0617%27 Feb
ancient5–13-0.068%25 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0319%25 Feb
vertigo2–13-0.0624%25 Feb
vertigo9–13-0.0313%25 Feb
vertigo13–90.0314%25 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0417%24 Feb
nuke7–13-0.055%23 Feb
vertigo16–130.0711%23 Feb
vertigo11–130.0322%23 Feb
anubis5–13-0.1110%23 Feb
vertigo13–11-0.0313%22 Feb
vertigo5–13-0.0425%21 Feb
vertigo11–130.0316%21 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0419%21 Feb
ancient4–130.0321%21 Feb
ancient13–60.0713%20 Feb
mirage13–40.0314%20 Feb
nuke4–13-0.0328%20 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0927%20 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0311%19 Feb
vertigo13–90.0415%13 Feb
vertigo13–90.0215%13 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0126%12 Feb
overpass7–13-0.086%12 Feb
inferno13–90.0012%12 Feb
inferno16–13-0.027%12 Feb
vertigo22–190.1117%12 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0711%7 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0521%7 Feb
vertigo16–140.0413%7 Feb
ancient14–160.0020%7 Feb
nuke7–13-0.046%6 Feb
inferno13–90.0211%6 Feb
ancient6–13-0.1222%6 Feb
overpass13–100.1214%5 Feb
nuke13–70.0211%5 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0117%2 Feb
nuke13–11-0.017%2 Feb
anubis13–90.0317%2 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0513%2 Feb
overpass9–130.0613%2 Feb
anubis8–13-0.037%2 Feb
ancient16–12-0.0313%2 Feb
vertigo13–70.1122%1 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0211%1 Feb
inferno7–130.0526%1 Feb
nuke13–70.0316%1 Feb
vertigo13–60.0416%1 Feb
mirage19–170.0117%1 Feb
anubis13–80.0322%1 Feb
inferno0–13-0.150%31 Jan
anubis13–100.0230%30 Jan
mirage19–150.0018%9 Jan
nuke13–100.0313%6 Jan
nuke13–70.0516%4 Jan
nuke16–13-0.0113%4 Jan
vertigo13–110.0020%4 Jan
vertigo3–13-0.047%29 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0316%29 Dec
vertigo13–7-0.0613%29 Dec
ancient8–130.0011%29 Dec
vertigo13–110.1020%19 Dec
inferno13–100.0125%19 Dec
vertigo2–6-0.0142%13 Dec
ancient8–13-0.0720%13 Dec
ancient5–13-0.068%6 Dec
vertigo13–10-0.0010%5 Dec
mirage8–130.0213%5 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →