yescries

yescries — CS2 Stats

US76561198992562217[U:1:1032296489]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

615Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGyescriesFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning54
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53389Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.2
Aggression5.2
Utility3.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.4
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time631ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy26.9%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 27.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 7ancientWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%0.02
dust2A25151060%0.00
infernoB24111346%0.01
ancientC94544%-0.01
nukeS75271%0.01
overpass2020%-0.01
cache110100%0.01
anubis1010%0.04
train110100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
81%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
74.3ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2888%1.2516.8
Mirage683%1.2615.3
Inferno3100%1.4921.7
Nuke20%0.9415.5
Train1100%1.0813.0
Anubis1100%0.7927.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.7%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.3%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
634msReaction time
22.8%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.42HE damage / grenade
4.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 22.7707% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–1-0.0338%30 Jul
dust25–13-0.029%30 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0538%26 Jun
dust213–80.0223%26 Jun
mirage13–60.0324%18 May
mirage10–13-0.0423%12 May
dust213–11-0.0320%30 Apr
cache13–90.0124%30 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0332%23 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0231%23 Apr
mirage13–110.0529%21 Apr
dust26–13-0.0430%15 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0235%12 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0431%16 Mar
mirage13–50.0331%12 Mar
mirage13–40.0628%12 Mar
inferno8–80.1634%28 Feb
inferno13–90.0127%19 Feb
dust213–100.0022%19 Feb
inferno9–30.2928%19 Feb
mirage13–90.0423%19 Feb
inferno6–13-0.0315%14 Feb
dust213–7-0.0140%12 Feb
mirage13–30.0352%12 Feb
dust29–13-0.0818%9 Feb
mirage5–130.0241%9 Feb
overpass10–13-0.0029%6 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0617%6 Feb
ancient13–100.0229%5 Feb
mirage10–130.0320%4 Feb
dust210–13-0.0118%4 Feb
anubis10–130.0419%4 Feb
dust213–6-0.0112%4 Feb
dust213–80.0126%4 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0031%4 Feb
mirage13–50.0337%4 Feb
nuke13–70.0228%4 Feb
mirage10–130.0124%1 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0213%31 Jan
mirage5–130.0226%30 Jan
mirage13–60.0925%30 Jan
inferno13–90.0321%30 Jan
ancient8–130.0417%30 Jan
mirage13–80.0133%30 Jan
inferno3–9-0.1135%26 Jan
inferno6–130.0031%26 Jan
mirage13–60.0022%26 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0230%23 Jan
dust213–90.0130%23 Jan
inferno13–8-0.0026%22 Jan
mirage10–130.0236%22 Jan
mirage12–70.0225%20 Jan
ancient7–70.0626%16 Jan
mirage13–110.0728%16 Jan
nuke13–7-0.0530%14 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0232%14 Jan
inferno13–40.0028%14 Jan
mirage6–13-0.0132%4 Jan
dust213–40.0832%4 Jan
dust213–50.0124%31 Dec
nuke13–10.0622%31 Dec
nuke13–60.0618%30 Dec
inferno13–7-0.0024%30 Dec
mirage14–160.0133%30 Dec
dust215–150.0232%29 Dec
nuke8–13-0.0532%29 Dec
dust216–120.0724%24 Dec
mirage13–2-0.0035%24 Dec
inferno8–80.0438%24 Dec
dust26–13-0.0635%22 Dec
train13–40.1026%11 Nov
dust216–14-0.0317%26 Oct
mirage15–150.0026%23 Oct
inferno9–60.0831%20 Oct
inferno0–9-0.2321%20 Oct
ancient6–13-0.0526%16 Oct
dust29–13-0.0123%16 Oct
mirage12–120.0320%10 Oct
dust26–13-0.0225%10 Oct
dust213–70.1527%4 Oct
inferno8–80.0330%4 Oct
inferno4–9-0.0831%4 Oct
mirage11–130.0428%4 Oct
overpass15–15-0.0222%3 Oct
mirage1–13-0.0122%3 Oct
ancient13–40.0538%3 Oct
inferno13–60.0317%2 Oct
mirage13–60.0840%2 Oct
mirage6–130.0118%2 Oct
dust211–13-0.0132%2 Oct
ancient13–16-0.0631%29 Sept
dust216–13-0.0210%29 Sept
nuke10–130.0527%29 Sept
dust28–13-0.0143%28 Sept
inferno13–60.0444%28 Sept
inferno5–13-0.0214%28 Sept
inferno15–150.0233%27 Sept
mirage13–110.0022%27 Sept
dust213–100.0433%26 Sept
inferno8–8-0.0232%26 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →