Ampfuel

Ampfuel — CS2 Stats

CA76561198892873840[U:1:932608112]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,205Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating18,937Purple band · top ~12.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8262 of 16435 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAmpfuelFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,937 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateLWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression5.8
Utility3.9
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time589ms−60ms
first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — nuke 1–1
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
107In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 77% over 13ancientWeakest map · 35% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%0.01
cacheC1771041%0.01
ancientC1761135%-0.02
dust2B157847%-0.01
nukeS1310377%0.03
infernoC73443%-0.02
anubisS64267%0.03
vertigo1010%-0.22

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

120Matches
52%Win rate
0.84Avg K/D
66.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2748%0.8211.9
Ancient2556%0.9815.0
Inferno1932%0.8813.4
Nuke1861%0.7711.6
Vertigo1173%0.8414.0
Anubis1060%0.6710.5
Dust21040%0.7910.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.4%Spray accuracy
65.9%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
589msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
36.0%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
4.97HE damage / grenade
7.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3123% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.0736%28 Aug
nuke13–30.1025%28 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0531%27 Aug
nuke13–80.0025%27 Aug
cache13–4-0.0117%27 Aug
mirage7–130.0129%26 Aug
mirage13–30.0224%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.048%26 Aug
mirage13–90.0218%26 Aug
cache3–130.0219%24 Aug
mirage3–130.0316%24 Aug
dust213–10-0.0424%23 Aug
ancient8–130.0321%23 Aug
cache11–130.0319%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.0513%23 Aug
cache4–130.0240%23 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0225%22 Aug
cache13–11-0.0118%22 Aug
nuke13–20.099%22 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0212%22 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0117%22 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0416%22 Aug
anubis3–130.0120%22 Aug
cache4–130.0111%22 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0421%21 Aug
inferno13–7-0.018%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0126%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0538%21 Aug
mirage7–130.0734%21 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0020%21 Aug
ancient16–13-0.0117%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0815%20 Aug
dust213–10-0.0016%20 Aug
nuke13–100.0515%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0022%20 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0317%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0514%20 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0716%20 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0027%18 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0517%16 Aug
dust23–130.039%14 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0217%14 Aug
cache13–100.0423%14 Aug
nuke13–160.0326%14 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0125%13 Aug
mirage13–30.0318%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0224%13 Aug
dust28–130.0223%12 Aug
nuke1–10.15100%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0215%12 Aug
cache9–130.0416%12 Aug
dust213–11-0.0415%12 Aug
mirage13–110.0613%12 Aug
cache9–13-0.048%12 Aug
inferno13–6-0.027%11 Aug
dust25–13-0.0617%10 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0015%10 Aug
ancient13–80.0130%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0111%10 Aug
dust213–11-0.0424%10 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0421%9 Aug
anubis13–70.0626%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0120%5 Aug
ancient16–130.0125%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0023%5 Aug
cache13–60.0216%4 Aug
mirage13–90.1116%4 Aug
inferno7–130.0319%4 Aug
dust211–130.0520%4 Aug
dust213–6-0.0245%3 Aug
cache10–130.0615%2 Aug
ancient15–150.0114%2 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0014%2 Aug
inferno4–9-0.088%29 Jul
vertigo1–9-0.2212%29 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0024%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0017%29 Jul
cache14–16-0.0128%28 Jul
ancient2–13-0.1130%28 Jul
mirage13–100.0623%25 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0315%25 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0121%25 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0825%24 Jul
inferno9–40.0824%23 Jul
cache13–5-0.046%23 Jul
cache9–13-0.0325%23 Jul
nuke13–100.0123%23 Jul
dust213–60.0020%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0320%22 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0520%21 Jul
ancient13–30.0333%21 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0224%21 Jul
cache13–110.0321%21 Jul
anubis13–40.1519%20 Jul
dust213–110.0621%20 Jul
cache6–130.0027%20 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0315%20 Jul
cache13–6-0.0410%20 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0222%18 Jul
dust29–13-0.0218%18 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →