Nort — CS2 Stats

76561198866139561[U:1:905873833]Steam profile ↗

1,159Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 Developing

FaceitLevel 8 · 2,054 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning52

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–61Last 10039%Win rateWLWWLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression7.4

Utility5.9

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.9

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning5.2

Utility5.9

Mechanics4.4

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time617ms−11ms

first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms

Headshot accuracy20.8%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 22.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–7

13–1Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

8–16In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 57% over 7ancientWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	41	15–26	37%	-0.01
vertigo	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.00
dust2	D	12	4–8	33%	0.01
anubis	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
ancient	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.02
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.03
overpass	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.02
cache	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
train	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

554Matches

53%Win rate

1.08Avg K/D

78.7ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	116	59%	1.20	16.7
Dust2	42	52%	0.96	15.6
Ancient	28	50%	0.93	13.8
Anubis	24	54%	1.06	16.3
Nuke	21	57%	1.15	16.6
Inferno	15	53%	1.05	14.4
Overpass	14	21%	0.91	12.8
Train	1	100%	4.67	28.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.3%Spray accuracy

69.9%Counter-strafing

8.5°Preaim

618msReaction time

26.3%T opening success

56.7%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

6.6%Flash assists

10.19HE damage / grenade

11.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.3013% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–11	-0.04	15%	27 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	25%	23 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.10	33%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	14%	6 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	14%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	28%	6 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.04	16%	6 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	20%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.08	29%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	20%	4 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.02	12%	4 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	17%	4 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.06	9%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	16%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	27%	3 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.08	15%	3 Aug →
overpass	8–13	-0.05	18%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	18%	2 Aug →
mirage	15–19	-0.03	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	36%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	11%	2 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.01	24%	31 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	0.02	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	26%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.09	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.05	35%	29 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	27%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.03	17%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.00	23%	28 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	16%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	19%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	11%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.04	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	12%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	48%	22 Jul →
train	13–2	0.03	25%	22 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.02	24%	22 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.08	18%	21 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	19%	21 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	-0.02	14%	12 Jul →
vertigo	16–19	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	4%	12 Jul →
vertigo	5–13	0.03	41%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–4	0.07	28%	30 Mar →
inferno	13–1	0.13	27%	27 Mar →
mirage	4–8	0.02	29%	19 Mar →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	30%	16 Mar →
mirage	16–14	0.02	16%	15 Mar →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	36%	13 Mar →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	19%	13 Mar →
dust2	13–16	-0.06	12%	12 Mar →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	15%	10 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	29%	9 Mar →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	19%	8 Mar →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	27%	6 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.06	21%	4 Mar →
overpass	8–13	-0.07	21%	2 Mar →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	15%	28 Feb →
dust2	6–13	0.08	43%	28 Feb →
vertigo	5–13	0.01	36%	27 Feb →
dust2	15–19	0.02	27%	25 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.04	28%	23 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.05	23%	21 Feb →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	34%	16 Feb →
nuke	9–13	0.07	17%	16 Feb →
dust2	12–16	0.02	38%	15 Feb →
mirage	13–11	0.05	29%	15 Feb →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	20%	14 Feb →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	38%	13 Feb →
overpass	13–3	0.04	13%	12 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	21%	12 Feb →
mirage	4–13	0.04	32%	12 Feb →
mirage	16–14	-0.00	18%	9 Feb →
mirage	13–1	0.04	38%	9 Feb →
nuke	19–16	-0.02	36%	6 Feb →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	10%	1 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	13%	30 Jan →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	20%	28 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	0%	25 Jan →
mirage	13–7	0.15	24%	25 Jan →
inferno	1–13	-0.12	0%	25 Jan →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	19%	24 Jan →
mirage	16–12	-0.03	32%	23 Jan →
ancient	9–13	0.01	21%	23 Jan →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	0%	23 Jan →
vertigo	13–10	0.00	18%	18 Jan →
vertigo	13–1	0.02	29%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.00	35%	18 Jan →
mirage	13–5	-0.02	35%	11 Jan →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	33%	9 Jan →
vertigo	22–20	0.09	15%	9 Jan →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	15%	7 Jan →
vertigo	13–16	0.03	22%	7 Jan →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	30%	7 Jan →
mirage	11–13	0.02	27%	7 Jan →
mirage	11–13	0.01	28%	7 Jan →
anubis	7–13	0.01	25%	7 Jan →
nuke	13–7	0.12	20%	6 Jan →