XDshooter007 — CS2 Stats

76561198866008266[U:1:905742538]✓ No bans

2,312Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.0 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,304Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1352 of 14558 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,347 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82

Positioning48

Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateWLLLWLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2

Aggression5.5

Utility6.3

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels0.6

Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 41% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2

Positioning4.8

Utility6.3

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels1.3

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time582ms−62ms

first ⅓ avg 644ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy15.7%−4.7%

first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–9

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7cacheWeakest map · 27% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	C	23	10–13	43%	0.01
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	0.02
anubis	A	18	11–7	61%	0.03
ancient	A	16	10–6	63%	0.02
cache	D	11	3–8	27%	-0.01
mirage	S	7	5–2	71%	0.02
dust2	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

383Matches

52%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

83.1ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Nuke	30	57%	1.41	15.9
Inferno	27	63%	1.25	15.2
Mirage	24	58%	1.30	16.5
Ancient	23	57%	1.19	16.5
Dust2	22	36%	1.18	17.8
Anubis	18	39%	1.14	17.4
Cache	7	43%	0.90	12.7
Overpass	2	50%	1.28	20.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.9%Spray accuracy

81.8%Counter-strafing

6.8°Preaim

573msReaction time

24.3%T opening success

40.7%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

4.9%Flash assists

10.42HE damage / grenade

9.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 24.3333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	13%	23 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	16%	22 Aug →
nuke	2–13	-0.08	17%	19 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	20%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	8%	17 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.01	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	15%	16 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.00	16%	15 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.11	12%	14 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	7%	14 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	16%	13 Aug →
inferno	14–16	0.05	19%	13 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	15%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.07	25%	12 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	7%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.09	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	19%	8 Aug →
mirage	19–17	-0.05	9%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	10%	7 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	14%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.16	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.01	18%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.05	18%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.07	30%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	22%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.06	26%	4 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	11%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.08	11%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.00	19%	3 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	16%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	16%	2 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.05	16%	2 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	29%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.01	35%	2 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.00	14%	1 Aug →
nuke	0–7	-0.05	20%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	24%	31 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.08	18%	30 Jul →
nuke	9–3	-0.02	4%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.11	32%	29 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.05	8%	29 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	30%	29 Jul →
nuke	1–13	-0.09	50%	27 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	25%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.02	26%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.02	19%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	18%	26 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.04	21%	25 Jul →
anubis	16–14	0.07	18%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–2	0.05	18%	25 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.02	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.10	23%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	18%	24 Jul →
nuke	6–13	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.07	15%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.05	21%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	20%	24 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.12	0%	23 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.06	28%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	23%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	32%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	21%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.05	22%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.06	34%	22 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.01	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	8–13	-0.00	11%	21 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.07	25%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.06	15%	20 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.03	50%	19 Jul →
nuke	10–13	0.02	18%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.14	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	18%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	23%	19 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	11%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.11	21%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.04	16%	18 Jul →
nuke	2–5	-0.07	18%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.06	14%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.04	26%	18 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.15	25%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.02	17%	18 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	8%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.02	8%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.07	18%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.00	38%	17 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.12	23%	17 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.07	13%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	30%	17 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	13%	17 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.00	12%	17 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.03	10%	17 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	39%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.10	14%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.04	26%	17 Jul →