akssells

akssells — CS2 Stats

76561198757014943[U:1:796749215]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

341Tracked matches66%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,833Purple band · top ~17.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18261 of 35926 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGakssellsFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER17,833 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64324Last 10064%Win rateLWLLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression8.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 62% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics2.6
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time634ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 634ms
Headshot accuracy22.7%+7.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.39Best rating — inferno 9–1
131Biggest win — inferno
9Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 28cacheWeakest map · 50% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2S2820871%0.01
mirageB26141254%0.01
infernoS2416867%0.06
nukeS75271%0.01
cacheB63350%0.00
ancientA53260%0.02
anubis43175%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

266Matches
48%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
79.7ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8748%1.0715.7
Dust25347%1.1616.4
Anubis3656%1.2316.9
Ancient3145%1.0613.9
Inferno2752%1.0615.0
Nuke2450%1.0418.3
Overpass50%1.0017.0
Cache367%0.7910.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
41.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.4%Spray accuracy
61.8%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
658msReaction time
39.7%T opening success
49.1%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
6.24HE damage / grenade
4.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.7484% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–16-0.0410%20 Aug
dust213–8-0.0122%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0913%18 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0319%18 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0327%18 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1517%18 Aug
inferno9–10.2736%18 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0924%17 Aug
inferno13–10.1230%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0119%17 Aug
cache13–7-0.0433%17 Aug
mirage13–70.0330%17 Aug
dust213–7-0.0422%17 Aug
dust213–70.0323%17 Aug
mirage13–110.0118%17 Aug
dust21–13-0.055%17 Aug
cache8–13-0.0226%17 Aug
inferno9–00.1343%17 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0514%16 Aug
inferno9–40.1224%16 Aug
inferno9–50.1224%16 Aug
inferno9–10.3922%16 Aug
inferno9–70.1514%16 Aug
inferno9–40.2016%16 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0116%16 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0827%16 Aug
inferno9–30.1118%16 Aug
inferno9–2-0.0367%16 Aug
inferno6–90.0213%16 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1911%16 Aug
inferno9–60.0833%16 Aug
nuke13–70.0116%16 Aug
inferno9–30.1520%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0220%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0423%16 Aug
dust213–50.0230%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0313%14 Aug
mirage13–50.0222%14 Aug
dust213–40.0030%14 Aug
dust213–40.0833%11 Aug
ancient16–120.0215%11 Aug
nuke13–80.0322%11 Aug
dust213–50.0617%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0113%10 Aug
dust28–130.0119%10 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0218%9 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0414%9 Aug
inferno13–70.0721%9 Aug
ancient13–40.129%6 Aug
dust213–100.0723%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0216%6 Aug
ancient13–40.019%6 Aug
mirage13–90.0826%6 Aug
dust213–11-0.0219%6 Aug
mirage11–130.0617%5 Aug
dust214–160.0211%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0721%5 Aug
mirage13–40.058%5 Aug
nuke2–13-0.088%4 Aug
mirage15–150.0415%4 Aug
cache13–40.0226%4 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0319%4 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0222%4 Aug
dust26–130.0313%4 Aug
ancient14–160.0118%3 Aug
dust213–60.0615%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0224%3 Aug
dust213–9-0.0211%2 Aug
mirage5–120.0315%1 Aug
dust213–90.0215%1 Aug
cache9–130.0616%1 Aug
mirage13–80.0224%1 Aug
nuke13–70.1511%31 Jul
dust213–80.088%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0114%31 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0414%31 Jul
mirage12–160.0414%31 Jul
mirage10–13-0.028%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0022%30 Jul
dust215–15-0.0114%30 Jul
inferno9–30.0219%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.037%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0421%30 Jul
dust213–80.0918%29 Jul
anubis13–6-0.028%27 Jul
dust216–130.0415%25 Jul
dust213–100.0116%24 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0617%16 Jul
nuke13–70.0511%16 Jul
inferno10–130.0617%16 Jul
anubis13–10.1316%16 Jul
mirage9–130.0310%16 Jul
dust213–9-0.0220%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0727%16 Jul
dust213–50.0517%16 Jul
mirage5–13-0.049%15 Jul
cache13–70.0519%15 Jul
cache1–13-0.0520%14 Jul
dust213–10-0.0526%14 Jul
mirage13–30.0417%14 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →