sabr. ｼ — CS2 Stats

76561198408093928[U:1:447828200]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

869Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.6 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,500 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79

Positioning49

Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53–44–3Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9

Aggression5.1

Utility6.6

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9

Positioning4.9

Utility6.6

Mechanics7.1

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time587ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy19.9%−3.1%

first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–10

13–2Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

18Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10ancientWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	36	19–17	53%	-0.00
dust2	B	17	8–9	47%	0.01
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.00
nuke	S	10	7–3	70%	0.04
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.01
ancient	D	5	1–4	20%	0.01
overpass	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
cache	—	2	2–0	100%	0.05
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	-0.02
agency	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01
grail	—	1	0–1	0%	0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,420Matches

51%Win rate

1.05Avg K/D

74.0ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	149	52%	1.02	14.6
Dust2	95	48%	1.00	14.8
Inferno	47	55%	1.08	15.0
Anubis	25	52%	0.91	14.0
Nuke	18	39%	1.05	15.1
Ancient	13	54%	1.24	15.6
Overpass	8	88%	1.13	14.5
Cache	4	50%	0.80	12.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.7%Spray accuracy

81.7%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

585msReaction time

27.7%T opening success

48.7%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

8.2%Flash assists

9.53HE damage / grenade

16.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.736% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–6	0.02	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–16	0.04	16%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.05	22%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.05	33%	21 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	20%	14 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.01	14%	14 May →
cache	13–5	0.08	19%	10 May →
nuke	9–13	0.01	15%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.03	29%	28 Mar →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	19%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.05	22%	22 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.06	31%	22 Mar →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	26%	7 Mar →
anubis	17–19	-0.04	13%	27 Feb →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	26%	24 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	17%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	11%	21 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	16%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	14%	4 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	18%	31 Jan →
mirage	16–13	0.02	22%	25 Jan →
ancient	11–13	0.03	25%	24 Jan →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	30%	17 Jan →
inferno	13–10	0.06	16%	5 Jan →
mirage	13–6	0.08	17%	29 Dec →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	19%	27 Dec →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	17%	27 Dec →
dust2	13–9	0.03	15%	13 Dec →
mirage	13–8	0.02	13%	13 Dec →
inferno	13–5	0.01	22%	12 Dec →
mirage	13–7	0.00	9%	12 Dec →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	20%	11 Dec →
nuke	13–7	0.07	26%	9 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	28%	9 Dec →
dust2	13–5	0.01	24%	7 Dec →
overpass	13–4	0.04	17%	7 Dec →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	12%	29 Nov →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	19%	23 Nov →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	16%	20 Nov →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	11%	19 Nov →
dust2	9–12	-0.10	5%	19 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.02	26%	14 Nov →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	15%	12 Nov →
mirage	13–11	0.03	26%	12 Nov →
overpass	16–13	0.01	28%	12 Nov →
mirage	10–13	-0.07	23%	9 Nov →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	25%	7 Nov →
vertigo	13–11	0.02	52%	6 Jun →
agency	13–4	0.01	34%	6 Jun →
grail	12–12	0.03	28%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	15%	10 May →
overpass	13–11	0.09	18%	3 May →
dust2	20–22	0.01	24%	3 May →
nuke	19–15	0.03	27%	1 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	27%	17 Apr →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	21%	17 Apr →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	12%	12 Apr →
dust2	13–9	0.04	27%	12 Apr →
nuke	14–16	-0.03	12%	6 Apr →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	19%	29 Mar →
anubis	16–14	-0.02	17%	28 Mar →
inferno	10–13	0.01	35%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.02	19%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–3	-0.05	25%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.04	30%	16 Mar →
dust2	11–13	0.03	22%	16 Mar →
mirage	10–13	0.00	21%	16 Mar →
ancient	13–10	0.04	26%	12 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.09	38%	12 Mar →
dust2	13–6	0.03	38%	12 Mar →
mirage	13–5	0.02	24%	12 Mar →
ancient	6–13	0.01	19%	11 Mar →
dust2	15–15	0.09	21%	11 Mar →
inferno	2–13	-0.07	22%	10 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.01	18%	9 Mar →
anubis	10–13	0.03	24%	25 Feb →
mirage	7–13	0.01	29%	24 Feb →
overpass	7–13	-0.00	20%	21 Feb →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	35%	20 Feb →
dust2	11–13	0.03	25%	18 Feb →
mirage	9–13	-0.10	14%	29 May →
nuke	13–8	0.03	29%	29 May →
inferno	13–16	-0.02	17%	27 Oct →
mirage	13–8	0.07	21%	27 Oct →
anubis	16–14	0.00	16%	23 Sept →
nuke	13–10	0.10	27%	21 Sept →
vertigo	16–12	-0.07	12%	17 Sept →
mirage	13–6	0.03	25%	17 Sept →
nuke	13–2	0.09	18%	17 Sept →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	26%	16 Sept →
overpass	8–13	0.03	21%	16 Sept →
anubis	11–13	0.03	16%	15 Sept →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	14%	15 Sept →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	24%	14 Sept →
anubis	13–8	-0.03	26%	14 Sept →
mirage	13–7	0.07	30%	13 Sept →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	16%	11 Sept →
inferno	10–13	0.07	28%	10 Sept →
inferno	12–16	0.05	33%	10 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.05	9%	9 Sept →