Click

Click — CS2 Stats

US76561198405493406[U:1:445227678]Steam profile ↗

1,717Tracked matches54%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGClickFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning44
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51409Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression3.7
Utility5.6
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 600ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time612ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy25.1%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 25.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — train 13–6
130Biggest win — overpass
4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
118In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9cacheWeakest map · 30% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheD2371630%-0.02
mirageA169756%-0.00
dust2A149564%-0.02
ancientB136746%-0.01
infernoB105550%0.02
anubisS96367%-0.01
nukeA74357%0.00
trainC52340%0.00
overpass330100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

373Matches
52%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
70.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7954%1.0014.9
Inferno7154%1.0214.3
Mirage6849%0.9313.3
Anubis5446%1.0414.7
Vertigo4163%1.2114.7
Nuke2850%1.0314.1
Dust22646%0.9613.4
Overpass367%0.9510.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.5%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
85.1%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
600msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
9.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 23 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno14–16-0.0428%26 Aug
mirage11–130.0322%25 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0336%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0522%25 Aug
ancient13–90.0325%24 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0419%24 Aug
cache11–13-0.0323%24 Aug
cache13–11-0.0124%21 Aug
dust213–110.0135%21 Aug
ancient0–13-0.0830%21 Aug
mirage13–80.0527%21 Aug
mirage13–60.0723%17 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0023%17 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0128%16 Aug
dust210–3-0.0244%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0714%15 Aug
dust27–13-0.0624%15 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0226%15 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0629%15 Aug
ancient10–130.0429%15 Aug
cache13–7-0.0030%15 Aug
anubis13–80.0721%15 Aug
train13–8-0.0023%15 Aug
nuke13–10.0627%6 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0610%6 Jul
cache8–13-0.0626%29 Jun
cache13–9-0.0030%29 Jun
cache1–13-0.0623%29 Jun
cache12–120.0121%27 Jun
cache13–50.0532%27 Jun
cache12–120.0217%27 Jun
cache13–110.0229%26 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0613%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0026%26 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0124%25 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0220%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0121%21 Jun
mirage13–100.0426%21 Jun
ancient10–130.0135%21 Jun
nuke13–20.0624%21 Jun
anubis9–13-0.027%21 Jun
cache12–12-0.0624%20 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0114%19 Jun
train13–60.1329%19 Jun
ancient8–130.0122%19 Jun
train6–130.0010%19 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0117%19 Jun
dust213–11-0.0725%17 Jun
train6–13-0.0921%17 Jun
dust213–11-0.0128%16 Jun
nuke3–11-0.079%16 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0112%16 Jun
nuke13–50.1027%15 Jun
inferno11–130.1318%15 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0434%14 Jun
overpass13–20.0121%11 Jun
cache12–12-0.0233%11 Jun
cache9–13-0.043%11 Jun
train12–12-0.0215%11 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0527%11 Jun
dust213–2-0.0113%10 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0418%10 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0329%10 Jun
inferno10–130.018%10 Jun
anubis13–70.0045%7 Jun
inferno6–130.0323%7 Jun
dust213–30.0335%7 Jun
mirage7–130.0216%7 Jun
overpass13–00.0025%7 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0519%3 Jun
dust27–130.0326%24 May
ancient9–13-0.0134%23 May
inferno16–130.0225%20 May
inferno13–100.0027%15 May
cache13–70.0215%14 May
cache12–12-0.0328%14 May
cache7–13-0.0116%13 May
cache1–130.020%13 May
cache5–13-0.0824%11 May
cache11–13-0.0628%6 May
anubis13–5-0.0411%4 May
ancient13–11-0.0611%3 May
cache9–13-0.0324%1 May
cache13–70.0213%1 May
cache12–12-0.0410%1 May
cache12–12-0.0414%30 Apr
dust213–40.0419%27 Apr
dust213–11-0.0216%26 Apr
mirage13–50.0026%26 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0121%26 Apr
dust213–50.0818%25 Apr
dust22–13-0.120%22 Apr
dust28–13-0.0914%22 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0213%22 Apr
inferno13–70.0517%22 Apr
anubis13–90.0324%17 Apr
ancient6–60.0514%17 Apr
nuke13–5-0.0015%17 Apr
dust211–13-0.0324%26 Feb
mirage13–5-0.0815%26 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →