pea

pea — CS2 Stats

76561198393410524[U:1:433144796]Steam profile ↗

791Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3896 of 28009 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpeaPREMIER24,999 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning47
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50482Last 10050%Win rateWWWLLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression3.7
Utility6.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.7
Utility6.1
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time553ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 553ms
Headshot accuracy24.0%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–2
131Biggest win — dust2
4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
129In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 69% over 16ancientWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29161355%-0.00
mirageS1611569%0.02
nukeD1651131%-0.03
infernoA117464%0.02
ancientD112918%0.00
cacheS96367%0.03
anubisD72529%0.02
overpass110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

286Matches
49%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
85.7ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
35%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4052%1.4317.3
Dust23152%1.3417.8
Ancient2050%1.0715.3
Inferno1984%1.2516.8
Nuke1354%1.3818.4
Anubis1242%1.2314.3
Vertigo838%0.9114.8
Cache650%0.8213.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
79.2%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
548msReaction time
21.6%T opening success
46.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
10.94HE damage / grenade
15.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5885% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–20.1616%28 Aug
mirage13–80.0321%18 Aug
cache13–110.0624%17 Aug
anubis4–130.0032%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0132%14 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1032%14 Aug
cache13–40.1130%14 Aug
inferno13–110.0326%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0423%7 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0643%6 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0720%6 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0619%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0123%5 Aug
ancient2–110.0523%5 Aug
cache10–130.0328%3 Aug
cache13–7-0.0123%3 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0314%30 Jul
dust213–70.0529%30 Jul
dust26–13-0.0333%30 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0319%29 Jul
mirage16–140.0319%27 Jul
inferno1–6-0.0033%27 Jul
inferno13–100.0118%23 Jul
dust27–13-0.0016%23 Jul
dust213–80.0424%22 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0310%22 Jul
cache11–130.1113%21 Jul
dust213–10-0.0632%21 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0015%16 Jul
cache13–9-0.0034%15 Jul
anubis14–160.0425%14 Jul
ancient3–13-0.089%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0031%10 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0627%10 Jul
cache13–110.0124%9 Jul
cache12–16-0.0119%7 Jul
dust213–100.0118%7 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0027%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0421%1 Jul
dust210–130.0223%26 Jun
dust28–130.0520%25 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0024%25 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0523%25 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0217%25 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0021%23 Jun
nuke13–50.0119%22 Jun
dust213–9-0.0023%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0317%22 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0317%22 Jun
mirage13–80.0419%17 Jun
nuke11–130.0322%15 Jun
anubis11–130.0313%15 Jun
ancient2–13-0.0827%11 Jun
inferno13–50.0527%11 Jun
ancient13–90.0428%9 Jun
dust27–13-0.0413%9 Jun
dust213–60.0524%5 Jun
mirage16–140.0215%5 Jun
dust26–13-0.0424%5 Jun
ancient5–130.1223%5 Jun
cache13–11-0.0020%3 Jun
dust213–1-0.0322%3 Jun
nuke1–7-0.1317%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.0515%3 Jun
ancient15–150.0620%2 Jun
dust216–13-0.0216%2 Jun
nuke13–110.0323%2 Jun
dust210–13-0.0736%1 Jun
dust213–110.0523%1 Jun
overpass13–70.0114%1 Jun
dust211–13-0.0215%29 May
nuke14–16-0.0018%28 May
inferno10–130.0133%28 May
mirage10–130.0532%28 May
dust213–100.0215%27 May
dust24–13-0.0917%27 May
dust28–13-0.0127%21 May
dust213–40.0720%21 May
nuke3–13-0.0521%21 May
dust213–110.0125%20 May
anubis9–130.1017%20 May
dust210–13-0.0220%20 May
mirage13–90.0912%15 May
nuke10–130.0419%15 May
dust28–13-0.0018%15 May
inferno5–13-0.0119%15 May
mirage13–70.0119%14 May
dust213–9-0.0732%14 May
nuke13–7-0.0022%14 May
dust213–20.1342%14 May
nuke11–13-0.0519%13 May
ancient15–15-0.0317%13 May
nuke1–6-0.037%13 May
nuke11–13-0.0033%12 May
dust213–110.0119%12 May
mirage13–40.0121%11 May
ancient10–130.0515%7 May
mirage13–80.0926%30 Apr
inferno13–60.0124%29 Apr
mirage13–30.0333%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →