Targetz

Targetz — CS2 Stats

SE76561198368686793[U:1:408421065]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,954Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,184Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2588 of 33117 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTargetzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,289 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER26,184 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91
Positioning63
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT63361Last 10063%Win rateLLWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1
Aggression9.6
Utility6.3
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1
Positioning6.3
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time503ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 503ms
Headshot accuracy22.1%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 16–13
131Biggest win — ancient
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 84% over 19cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA28171161%0.01
mirageS2517868%0.03
ancientS1916384%0.02
overpassA85363%-0.00
anubisC73443%0.03
cacheD62433%0.00
dust241325%-0.04
train110100%-0.08
stronghold1010%0.04
alpine110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,227Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
71.0ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44346%1.1415.9
Inferno34355%1.0915.2
Ancient33851%1.1415.4
Anubis23852%1.1815.9
Overpass10156%1.1015.8
Train6659%1.1415.1
Nuke2050%0.9815.8
Dust21729%0.8213.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.3%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.7%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
491msReaction time
33.0%T opening success
63.7%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
10.8%Flash assists
8.56HE damage / grenade
9.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9912% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–130.0818%28 Aug
dust21–13-0.0412%28 Aug
anubis13–90.0916%28 Aug
ancient16–140.0120%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0524%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0111%23 Aug
ancient13–60.108%21 Aug
mirage13–30.0715%21 Aug
ancient16–140.0117%16 Aug
mirage6–13-0.009%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0031%16 Aug
ancient13–90.0624%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0413%11 Aug
inferno13–5-0.029%11 Aug
ancient13–10.0329%11 Aug
ancient13–50.0014%8 Aug
anubis1–13-0.06100%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0130%4 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0336%4 Aug
mirage15–150.0214%4 Aug
inferno13–100.0512%2 Aug
ancient13–50.0421%2 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0627%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0419%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0123%30 Jul
cache13–80.0225%30 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0027%27 Jul
inferno13–90.0517%27 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0930%22 Jul
inferno13–110.1022%22 Jul
mirage9–20.0322%20 Jul
cache2–13-0.0617%20 Jul
anubis13–80.0322%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.0320%13 Jul
anubis13–80.0827%13 Jul
mirage13–30.0527%12 Jul
dust213–30.0120%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.0522%12 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0229%12 Jul
inferno9–130.0114%9 Jul
cache10–13-0.0018%8 Jul
inferno14–160.0111%5 Jul
inferno9–130.0512%5 Jul
ancient19–17-0.0118%5 Jul
overpass14–16-0.0114%4 Jul
dust22–13-0.1123%3 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0516%3 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0221%27 Jun
inferno13–60.0425%26 Jun
mirage13–10.1038%26 Jun
train13–6-0.0821%23 Jun
inferno13–50.0011%23 Jun
overpass5–130.0020%23 Jun
inferno13–30.1133%21 Jun
mirage3–130.0010%18 Jun
overpass16–14-0.0116%18 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0620%18 Jun
mirage13–70.0616%13 Jun
inferno16–130.1237%13 Jun
ancient13–110.0528%13 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0247%11 Jun
overpass1–7-0.0933%10 Jun
inferno16–130.038%7 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0161%2 Jun
overpass19–17-0.008%24 May
inferno5–13-0.0124%24 May
mirage10–130.0632%20 May
mirage13–80.0430%19 May
inferno13–110.0438%19 May
mirage13–40.0020%19 May
ancient19–160.0527%11 May
mirage13–70.0113%11 May
mirage16–13-0.0415%10 May
ancient11–13-0.0220%8 May
inferno25–220.0038%8 May
ancient13–10.0519%30 Apr
cache13–80.0418%30 Apr
ancient7–00.000%28 Apr
overpass13–110.0116%26 Apr
ancient13–90.0120%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0542%21 Apr
inferno13–100.007%19 Apr
ancient13–60.0312%13 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0513%12 Apr
anubis10–130.0215%11 Apr
ancient10–130.0320%11 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0220%11 Apr
stronghold9–130.049%11 Apr
alpine13–90.0513%11 Apr
anubis10–130.0820%11 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0214%11 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0214%11 Apr
overpass16–140.0413%10 Apr
inferno13–6-0.0119%29 Mar
mirage13–80.0829%29 Mar
ancient13–70.0413%29 Mar
mirage13–100.0928%28 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0622%28 Mar
overpass13–50.0519%28 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →