RandoM — CS2 Stats

76561198361362793[U:1:401097065]

1,210Tracked matches54%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,892Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#8977 of 24069 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRandoMFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,892 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning44
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44524Last 10044%Win rateWLTLLTLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -50pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.5
Aggression6.3
Utility5.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning4.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time542ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–4
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB35171849%0.03
dust2B24111346%0.05
nukeB115645%0.01
infernoB105550%0.02
cacheD62433%0.01
overpassS54180%-0.01
ancientD5050%-0.05
anubis2020%0.02
sanctum1010%0.14
poseidon1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,334Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
78.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno540%1.1016.2
Ancient250%1.4819.5
Dust21100%0.587.0
Anubis10%0.447.0
Mirage1100%1.4834.0
Nuke10%0.6511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
529msReaction time
28.3%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.80HE damage / grenade
11.44Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2865% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0625%12 Aug
cache7–130.009%12 Aug
mirage12–120.1017%8 Aug
mirage7–13-0.038%8 Aug
cache6–130.0617%8 Aug
inferno12–120.0221%6 Aug
cache11–130.0119%6 Aug
mirage10–130.018%6 Aug
dust27–13-0.0513%6 Aug
cache8–13-0.0421%3 Aug
cache13–11-0.017%3 Aug
overpass16–12-0.0720%2 Jul
inferno13–90.0213%2 Jul
mirage13–110.0114%2 Jul
nuke13–70.0918%1 Jul
dust213–7-0.0316%1 Jul
sanctum8–80.1427%29 Jun
poseidon7–9-0.039%29 Jun
dust28–130.0815%29 Jun
nuke8–13-0.039%29 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0123%29 Jun
mirage9–130.0123%29 Jun
anubis10–130.0310%29 Jun
mirage13–20.0729%28 Jun
mirage13–40.0115%28 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0616%28 Jun
anubis10–130.0111%27 Jun
nuke13–40.0420%27 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0811%27 Jun
inferno16–120.0310%27 Jun
dust213–20.0416%26 Jun
mirage13–90.0325%26 Jun
dust28–130.0919%26 Jun
inferno11–13-0.029%26 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0316%26 Jun
inferno2–13-0.0712%26 Jun
ancient1–6-0.0910%26 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0619%25 Jun
nuke16–130.008%25 Jun
dust214–160.0613%24 Jun
dust213–50.1113%24 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0121%24 Jun
nuke12–160.0415%23 Jun
mirage0–13-0.014%23 Jun
dust213–7-0.0222%23 Jun
overpass13–70.0618%23 Jun
dust213–110.0421%23 Jun
dust213–11-0.0118%22 Jun
mirage5–12-0.0215%22 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0113%22 Jun
mirage13–40.2327%22 Jun
nuke13–8-0.058%22 Jun
overpass10–13-0.0613%21 Jun
mirage13–60.0614%21 Jun
dust213–30.0917%16 Jun
inferno9–130.0516%16 Jun
overpass13–110.0112%16 Jun
mirage13–60.1217%16 Jun
dust212–160.0911%15 Jun
mirage13–40.0630%15 Jun
overpass16–13-0.0121%14 Jun
dust26–130.0113%14 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0117%14 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0716%13 Jun
mirage13–160.0016%13 Jun
dust25–130.0013%12 Jun
ancient4–13-0.088%12 Jun
mirage13–10.1716%12 Jun
mirage5–130.0714%3 Jun
dust210–13-0.0121%3 Jun
mirage13–70.1115%3 Jun
mirage13–10.1114%3 Jun
mirage13–100.059%2 Jun
dust213–90.1022%2 Jun
dust212–160.009%31 May
mirage13–7-0.046%31 May
inferno13–30.1010%31 May
dust214–160.005%30 May
dust213–110.1515%29 May
mirage6–130.0119%29 May
ancient4–130.029%29 May
nuke5–130.0414%29 May
dust213–60.1717%27 May
mirage13–4-0.033%27 May
mirage13–40.0021%25 May
dust210–130.1021%25 May
nuke7–130.0014%24 May
dust25–13-0.0313%24 May
mirage10–130.0122%24 May
mirage8–130.1015%22 May
inferno7–130.0022%22 May
mirage6–13-0.0218%21 May
nuke11–130.0212%20 May
mirage15–150.0717%20 May
inferno13–60.0617%20 May
nuke6–13-0.0124%18 May
dust210–130.0215%18 May
dust23–00.1029%18 May
inferno13–80.0026%18 May
mirage13–10.0216%18 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →