Heith Bar — CS2 Stats

76561198359236144[U:1:398970416]

203Tracked matches38%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 4 · 927 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHeith BarFACEITLevel 4 · 927 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning50
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateLLLWLWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression4.3
Utility3.4
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 684ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.0
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time684ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 684ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 17.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–2
132Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
1110In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5overpassWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A23131057%0.00
mirageC1881044%-0.02
ancientC1881044%-0.00
nukeC146843%-0.01
infernoA116555%0.01
overpassD72529%-0.02
anubisA53260%0.00
cache21150%0.06
office1010%-0.06
train1010%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
39%Win rate
1.40Avg K/D
88.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
13%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient650%1.5720.8
Dust2560%1.5520.0
Mirage520%1.2117.4
Nuke10%1.0716.0
Inferno10%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
684msReaction time
27.5%T opening success
48.0%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
7.25HE damage / grenade
4.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.5173% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–13-0.0132%25 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0321%25 Aug
dust27–13-0.0418%21 Aug
ancient16–130.0120%20 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0224%20 Aug
mirage13–80.0431%20 Aug
ancient13–100.0310%20 Aug
inferno9–70.0523%20 Aug
dust215–150.0015%17 Aug
cache13–20.0132%17 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0315%13 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0514%12 Aug
office5–8-0.060%12 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0619%12 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1018%10 Aug
nuke11–130.0021%6 Aug
ancient8–130.0213%6 Aug
dust213–100.1017%5 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0427%5 Aug
inferno13–110.0142%5 Aug
dust25–130.0010%31 Jul
cache11–130.1131%31 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0619%31 Jul
dust216–14-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0424%22 Jul
anubis8–130.0114%22 Jul
inferno9–50.129%22 Jul
inferno13–9-0.066%6 Jun
anubis13–7-0.0118%6 Jun
dust29–13-0.0410%6 Jun
dust213–9-0.0514%6 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0612%5 Jun
dust216–14-0.0915%5 Jun
ancient15–15-0.036%4 Jun
nuke16–13-0.029%4 Jun
nuke13–8-0.064%4 Jun
mirage14–16-0.0410%29 May
anubis13–40.049%29 May
mirage4–13-0.033%29 May
mirage13–6-0.0721%29 May
nuke15–15-0.0410%29 May
dust213–6-0.045%28 May
nuke1–13-0.0314%28 May
nuke7–13-0.1311%28 May
anubis13–60.006%28 May
dust28–13-0.0815%28 May
mirage13–9-0.0616%28 May
nuke13–70.018%27 May
dust29–13-0.0410%26 May
mirage8–13-0.1114%26 May
overpass2–13-0.0929%2 Sept
overpass4–13-0.0615%1 Sept
train10–130.0617%1 Sept
nuke13–20.1610%1 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0012%1 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0913%31 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0315%31 Aug
inferno8–80.0713%31 Aug
mirage11–130.0224%29 Aug
mirage13–70.0410%29 Aug
dust216–130.0416%28 Aug
dust26–13-0.0210%25 Aug
dust213–90.0919%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0216%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0819%24 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0911%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0610%23 Aug
dust216–130.0016%23 Aug
dust213–100.0120%23 Aug
ancient13–80.0515%23 Aug
dust216–12-0.0114%22 Aug
dust215–150.0115%22 Aug
overpass10–130.0216%22 Aug
dust213–50.1417%21 Aug
ancient13–40.0113%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0116%21 Aug
overpass10–13-0.0619%21 Aug
ancient4–13-0.037%21 Aug
ancient6–130.0020%21 Aug
dust210–130.0624%20 Aug
ancient0–13-0.1022%20 Aug
overpass13–110.0233%20 Aug
dust213–110.0824%20 Aug
overpass13–110.0116%19 Aug
ancient11–130.0127%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0227%19 Aug
inferno11–130.0223%19 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0221%19 Aug
dust216–120.0027%18 Aug
nuke13–80.0224%18 Aug
mirage13–100.0323%18 Aug
ancient13–30.0110%18 Aug
inferno5–13-0.078%17 Aug
dust211–13-0.0221%17 Aug
inferno12–10.0411%17 Aug
ancient13–80.0712%17 Aug
overpass8–130.0118%17 Aug
inferno13–110.0414%17 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0211%15 Aug
nuke13–8-0.027%15 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →