dankrat

dankrat — CS2 Stats

76561198348314146[U:1:388048418]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

502Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,578Blue band · top ~35.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#23441 of 35616 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdankratFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER13,578 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim61
Positioning47
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateWLLWLWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.1
Aggression3.6
Utility5.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 638ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.1
Positioning4.7
Utility5.1
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels0.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time654ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy25.9%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 28.2% → last ⅓ avg 25.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–8
130Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 18ancientWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B31151648%-0.01
mirageA1811761%-0.02
infernoC156940%-0.01
nukeB137654%0.01
ancientD93633%-0.03
cacheC73443%0.02
anubisC52340%-0.00
vertigo2020%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
60%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
80.9ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage540%1.2118.4
Overpass367%1.4119.0
Dust22100%1.0416.0
Inferno250%0.739.5
Ancient1100%1.1416.0
Nuke10%0.8612.0
Vertigo1100%1.6715.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

26.9%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
24.2%Spray accuracy
84.1%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
638msReaction time
31.6%T opening success
24.9%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
8.16HE damage / grenade
5.90Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.6032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–11-0.0228%5 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0130%5 Aug
dust211–130.0016%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0831%3 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0811%3 Aug
anubis13–100.0036%31 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0814%31 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0428%31 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0124%30 Jul
vertigo12–120.0533%29 Jul
vertigo9–130.0745%29 Jul
dust210–130.0330%29 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0728%28 Jul
cache7–13-0.0130%28 Jul
dust213–60.0834%28 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0630%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0121%28 Jul
anubis7–130.0730%27 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0841%27 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0422%26 Jul
dust211–13-0.0822%25 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0518%25 Jul
dust213–6-0.0633%24 Jul
ancient13–00.000%23 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0827%23 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0719%23 Jul
dust213–6-0.0225%23 Jul
dust25–130.1329%23 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0220%23 Jul
dust26–13-0.0633%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0219%21 Jul
dust213–11-0.0524%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0324%21 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0732%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0025%20 Jul
nuke13–110.0833%20 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0047%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0125%17 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0420%16 Jul
inferno16–140.0527%16 Jul
mirage13–80.0020%15 Jul
cache10–130.0427%14 Jul
nuke8–130.0311%14 Jul
dust22–13-0.0633%14 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0844%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0038%13 Jul
dust25–13-0.0231%13 Jul
cache4–130.0623%13 Jul
inferno11–130.0331%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0233%13 Jul
mirage9–130.0152%12 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0121%11 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0529%10 Jul
inferno13–1-0.0518%10 Jul
cache13–60.0123%10 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0320%10 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0019%10 Jul
cache13–90.0725%9 Jul
dust214–160.0121%9 Jul
mirage13–1-0.0120%9 Jul
dust25–13-0.0319%9 Jul
cache12–12-0.0430%7 Jul
dust213–20.0039%7 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0224%6 Jul
dust213–80.1324%5 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0621%3 Jul
nuke11–130.0549%3 Jul
nuke13–100.0935%2 Jul
inferno13–50.0423%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0526%2 Jul
cache13–50.0428%2 Jul
mirage13–80.0234%2 Jul
dust213–6-0.0210%2 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0129%30 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0326%30 Jun
dust23–13-0.0530%30 Jun
dust213–11-0.0120%29 Jun
dust213–3-0.0333%26 Jun
dust213–6-0.0130%26 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0430%25 Jun
dust216–120.0021%24 Jun
mirage13–70.0024%24 Jun
inferno8–130.0944%24 Jun
dust213–80.0327%24 Jun
dust213–7-0.0129%24 Jun
dust211–13-0.0428%23 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0023%23 Jun
nuke3–20.1225%23 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0519%23 Jun
anubis9–130.0142%23 Jun
nuke13–3-0.0453%23 Jun
nuke13–100.0530%22 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0320%22 Jun
ancient3–13-0.1113%22 Jun
dust23–13-0.0441%22 Jun
dust213–80.0419%22 Jun
dust213–160.0021%22 Jun
inferno13–100.0231%21 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0134%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0135%16 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →