rato GOD — CS2 Stats

BR76561198339411320[U:1:379145592]Steam profile ↗

1,429Tracked matches62%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,326 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning58

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT64–35–1Last 10064%Win rateLWWWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression8.6

Utility5.7

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 34% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 551ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.8

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time555ms−28ms

first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms

Headshot accuracy27.5%+1.3%

first ⅓ avg 26.1% → last ⅓ avg 27.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.33Best rating — inferno 9–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 74% over 39ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	39	29–10	74%	0.04
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.06
ancient	C	12	5–7	42%	0.04
dust2	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
anubis	S	9	6–3	67%	0.05
nuke	S	7	5–2	71%	0.04
cache	S	6	4–2	67%	0.07
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

627Matches

55%Win rate

1.16Avg K/D

79.3ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	225	53%	1.14	15.9
Ancient	99	54%	1.08	14.3
Dust2	91	65%	1.24	16.8
Anubis	59	51%	1.14	16.9
Nuke	46	54%	1.23	17.5
Inferno	32	47%	1.15	16.4
Train	9	78%	1.63	17.3
Cache	7	86%	0.97	14.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.0%Headshot accuracy

35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.7%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

551msReaction time

34.2%T opening success

63.4%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

8.9%Flash assists

7.11HE damage / grenade

13.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.1745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	2–13	-0.05	25%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.08	30%	25 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.06	30%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	18%	25 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.01	24%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	11%	20 Aug →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	33%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.07	35%	19 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	25%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	26%	18 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.04	30%	17 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	31%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	12–12	0.02	26%	13 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.06	31%	13 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.16	43%	13 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.10	49%	13 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.01	13%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.00	23%	12 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.03	39%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.04	28%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–16	0.04	26%	11 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	27%	7 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.10	23%	7 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	28%	7 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.06	25%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	42%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	16%	4 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.05	29%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–1	0.02	25%	4 Aug →
mirage	16–13	0.07	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	36%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.09	24%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.10	44%	3 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.01	33%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	29%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.01	27%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	30%	31 Jul →
cache	6–13	0.03	38%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.02	43%	31 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.00	40%	31 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	19%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	20%	30 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	22%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.12	36%	29 Jul →
inferno	16–14	-0.04	31%	29 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.06	29%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.12	32%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	24%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.16	35%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.00	30%	28 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.09	24%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.05	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	11%	27 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.08	30%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	24%	27 Jul →
inferno	16–13	0.09	28%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	16%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	24%	24 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	23%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.09	28%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	16%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.07	26%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.13	17%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.03	19%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.04	15%	21 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	37%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–4	0.08	23%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.13	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	15–19	0.01	23%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	58%	20 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	50%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.12	29%	20 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.04	22%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–3	0.23	25%	20 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.06	16%	20 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.03	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.09	8%	17 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.03	30%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	23%	16 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	33%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.03	17%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.06	20%	15 Jul →
inferno	19–16	0.05	30%	15 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.05	22%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.09	33%	14 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.06	34%	14 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.06	27%	13 Jul →
inferno	17–19	0.00	15%	13 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.05	10%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	27%	10 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	28%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.06	28%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.05	24%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.01	28%	9 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	30%	9 Jul →
poseidon	9–4	0.18	31%	9 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.33	30%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	13%	8 Jul →