inputnulo — CS2 Stats

76561198329588429[U:1:369322701]

3,426Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,137 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGinputnuloFACEITLevel 10 · 3,137 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning48
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5149Last 10051%Win rateLLWLWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression4.3
Utility3.5
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning4.8
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time573ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy25.4%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.1% → last ⅓ avg 25.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–10
131Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
1213In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 43% over 30
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC30131743%0.00
anubisB26141254%-0.00
mirageB178947%-0.00
vertigoC94544%0.01
dust2B63350%-0.01
infernoS65183%0.02
overpassS54180%-0.00
train1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 30). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

11,399Matches
53%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
84.5ADR
58%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
23Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient35754%1.1917.3
Mirage33548%1.1216.4
Dust224854%1.3018.2
Anubis23453%1.0715.6
Vertigo11247%1.1516.8
Inferno7457%1.2317.1
Overpass5756%1.0716.3
Nuke3639%1.1215.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.1%Headshot accuracy
33.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
83.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
567msReaction time
16.0%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.34HE damage / grenade
15.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 15.9969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 30 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient8–130.0134%25 Aug
dust210–130.0125%25 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0519%21 Aug
train9–130.0427%11 Nov
ancient13–10-0.0019%10 Nov
dust213–6-0.0631%31 May
mirage10–13-0.0131%1 May
anubis13–20.0625%12 Jan
anubis7–13-0.0417%4 Jan
dust214–16-0.0313%26 Dec
ancient13–60.0729%26 Dec
anubis15–190.0041%22 Dec
mirage7–13-0.0531%22 Dec
dust213–100.0120%12 Oct
dust213–40.0423%6 Oct
inferno6–13-0.0438%31 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0225%28 Aug
dust225–28-0.0326%31 Jul
overpass13–40.0820%31 Mar
overpass13–80.0117%8 Mar
anubis3–13-0.1212%8 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0333%8 Mar
vertigo13–60.1037%8 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0128%8 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0725%5 Mar
ancient5–130.0325%5 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0132%5 Mar
ancient7–13-0.073%28 Feb
anubis6–130.0429%28 Feb
anubis9–13-0.0821%28 Feb
mirage13–11-0.0229%28 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0731%28 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0123%28 Feb
anubis13–110.0421%27 Feb
anubis12–160.0432%27 Feb
ancient13–70.0133%27 Feb
anubis13–11-0.076%27 Feb
mirage16–12-0.0325%27 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0525%26 Feb
vertigo14–160.0228%26 Feb
vertigo13–30.0222%26 Feb
ancient16–140.0626%26 Feb
mirage3–10.0438%26 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0627%26 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0632%25 Feb
anubis13–110.0321%25 Feb
anubis13–60.0825%25 Feb
ancient14–16-0.0225%25 Feb
ancient2–13-0.1120%25 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0421%25 Feb
ancient5–130.0147%25 Feb
vertigo9–130.0222%25 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0035%25 Feb
anubis13–110.0230%25 Feb
ancient13–20.0723%25 Feb
inferno13–80.0515%24 Feb
mirage11–130.0126%24 Feb
ancient13–60.0729%24 Feb
anubis13–70.0129%24 Feb
mirage14–16-0.0325%24 Feb
inferno13–10.0527%24 Feb
ancient13–60.0936%24 Feb
overpass13–60.0223%24 Feb
ancient13–7-0.0035%24 Feb
anubis4–13-0.0535%23 Feb
inferno13–110.0219%21 Feb
anubis10–130.0129%21 Feb
ancient15–19-0.0523%20 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0728%18 Feb
ancient11–13-0.0617%18 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0130%18 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0530%17 Feb
anubis7–130.0217%16 Feb
mirage13–100.1028%16 Feb
ancient16–120.0223%4 Feb
mirage14–160.0027%4 Feb
mirage13–70.0726%4 Feb
ancient17–190.0115%4 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0136%4 Feb
mirage4–130.0319%3 Feb
ancient11–130.0112%3 Feb
ancient16–14-0.0030%3 Feb
anubis13–9-0.0123%3 Feb
ancient11–130.0931%3 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.055%3 Feb
vertigo13–50.0223%3 Feb
inferno13–60.0738%3 Feb
overpass2–13-0.1210%3 Feb
mirage13–80.0433%3 Feb
vertigo13–70.0324%3 Feb
vertigo6–13-0.0511%31 Jan
ancient14–160.0228%31 Jan
ancient9–13-0.0026%31 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0227%31 Jan
ancient13–100.0932%31 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0126%31 Jan
vertigo8–13-0.048%31 Jan
anubis13–80.0128%30 Jan
anubis13–60.0931%30 Jan
anubis13–100.0430%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →