Tyler

Tyler — CS2 Stats

76561198319149256[U:1:358883528]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

52Tracked matches55%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 Developing
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning44
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY29181Last 4860%Win rateWLLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9
Aggression3.6
Utility2.9
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.4
Utility2.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time641ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 48 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.29Best rating — nuke 9–1
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5ancientWeakest map · 57% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA138562%-0.02
dust2A85363%-0.01
infernoS86275%-0.00
ancientA74357%-0.02
nukeS54180%0.07
anubis3030%-0.06
vertigo21150%0.01
overpass21150%-0.03

Across the last 48 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
50%Win rate
0.54Avg K/D
54.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1100%0.436.0
Dust21100%0.8511.0
Anubis10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
643msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
34.1%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
1.86HE damage / grenade
7.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2588% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–50.0318%11 Jul
mirage1–13-0.067%11 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0821%20 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0711%20 Jun
dust213–50.0123%20 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0616%25 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0523%11 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0319%11 Apr
mirage13–50.0118%11 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0219%11 Apr
dust212–16-0.0625%11 Apr
inferno5–9-0.1118%8 Apr
nuke9–10.2914%8 Apr
inferno9–50.0722%8 Apr
vertigo9–00.179%8 Apr
inferno9–7-0.0126%8 Apr
vertigo5–9-0.1519%8 Apr
dust213–110.0222%3 Apr
nuke13–10-0.038%3 Apr
dust29–130.0315%3 Apr
ancient4–13-0.046%3 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0012%3 Apr
dust215–15-0.0421%3 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0126%3 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0331%3 Apr
dust213–110.0230%3 Apr
overpass13–11-0.0417%3 Apr
nuke5–130.0531%3 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0530%2 Apr
nuke13–20.0510%2 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0713%2 Apr
mirage13–9-0.0418%28 Mar
mirage13–7-0.053%28 Mar
mirage13–40.0927%28 Mar
ancient13–50.1014%28 Mar
mirage8–13-0.060%28 Mar
inferno13–00.0519%28 Mar
ancient13–5-0.059%28 Mar
mirage13–40.0515%28 Mar
anubis4–13-0.0817%27 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0329%27 Mar
inferno13–100.0619%27 Mar
ancient13–10.0511%27 Mar
nuke13–0-0.0012%27 Mar
dust213–3-0.0717%27 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0414%18 Sept
inferno16–8-0.008%4 Sept
inferno7–9-0.0610%4 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →