WolfixLMAO — CS2 Stats

76561198318503726[U:1:358237998]✓ No bans

265Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.8 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating27,638Top 10% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90

Positioning71

Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY59–35–6Last 10059%Win rateWWWTWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.0

Aggression7.8

Utility4.5

Positioning7.1

Opening Duels4.3

Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0

Positioning7.1

Utility4.5

Mechanics8.7

Opening Duels4.3

Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time639ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 649ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms

Headshot accuracy28.7%+2.2%

first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — nuke 13–6

13–0Biggest win — mirage

7Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 25overpassWeakest map · 43% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	25	17–8	68%	0.03
dust2	A	19	12–7	63%	0.02
cache	B	15	8–7	53%	0.06
nuke	S	12	8–4	67%	0.07
inferno	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
overpass	C	7	3–4	43%	0.03
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	0.03
vertigo	—	3	1–2	33%	0.07
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
poseidon	—	2	1–1	50%	0.16
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

31Matches

61%Win rate

1.62Avg K/D

98.6ADR

40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	4	50%	1.41	17.3
Cache	2	50%	1.24	19.0
Dust2	2	100%	0.94	13.0
Inferno	1	100%	2.91	32.0
Anubis	1	0%	1.71	24.0
Ancient	1	100%	2.25	27.0
Nuke	1	100%	2.18	24.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.5%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.2%Spray accuracy

89.3%Counter-strafing

8.1°Preaim

622msReaction time

32.5%T opening success

61.5%CT opening success

0.67Enemies flashed / flash

9.1%Flash assists

3.76HE damage / grenade

9.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 32.4914% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–9	-0.03	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	35%	10 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.03	29%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	17%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	33%	21 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.08	34%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–0	-0.00	50%	19 Jul →
cache	5–13	0.01	26%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.00	25%	19 Jul →
nuke	6–13	0.04	22%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.02	30%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.08	21%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.10	39%	19 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	28%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.02	0%	18 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	27%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–1	0.03	63%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.01	26%	18 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	26%	18 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.00	24%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.05	21%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.09	20%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.00	42%	12 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	33%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.01	37%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.09	20%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.08	31%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	23%	11 Jul →
cache	13–5	0.09	31%	11 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.05	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	41%	10 Jul →
cache	13–1	0.12	41%	9 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.27	46%	7 Jul →
ancient	12–12	0.04	26%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–0	0.09	22%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	30%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.18	28%	5 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.02	21%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	33%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–3	0.01	24%	28 Jun →
cache	13–7	0.01	41%	28 Jun →
office	12–12	0.02	30%	28 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.09	26%	28 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	19%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–10	0.03	33%	23 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.02	45%	23 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	35%	10 Jun →
vertigo	13–2	0.08	43%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–6	0.30	23%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–6	0.15	33%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.00	34%	6 Jun →
overpass	8–13	0.04	26%	6 Jun →
vertigo	8–13	0.09	36%	6 Jun →
vertigo	9–13	0.02	19%	5 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.05	26%	1 Jun →
anubis	13–9	0.11	20%	29 May →
anubis	0–12	-0.01	41%	29 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	29%	24 May →
mirage	6–13	0.00	14%	24 May →
mirage	13–6	0.01	23%	23 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.02	15%	23 May →
overpass	11–13	-0.04	25%	23 May →
mirage	13–9	0.01	30%	23 May →
inferno	13–8	-0.07	18%	22 May →
nuke	4–13	0.09	35%	20 May →
poseidon	4–8	0.17	18%	7 May →
cache	13–4	-0.01	24%	7 May →
cache	7–13	0.02	15%	7 May →
inferno	9–5	-0.00	50%	5 May →
nuke	9–7	0.08	18%	4 May →
poseidon	9–6	0.14	30%	4 May →
anubis	13–4	0.01	16%	2 May →
mirage	11–13	0.09	15%	2 May →
mirage	16–12	0.01	25%	1 May →
overpass	10–13	-0.03	28%	1 May →
inferno	9–13	0.07	34%	1 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	23%	1 May →
dust2	13–3	0.07	30%	1 May →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	27%	1 May →
overpass	7–13	0.04	31%	1 May →
mirage	2–11	-0.04	25%	1 May →
nuke	13–6	0.14	31%	30 Apr →
cache	10–13	0.05	27%	30 Apr →
cache	13–4	0.19	36%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.06	27%	30 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.02	24%	28 Apr →
ancient	13–11	0.09	25%	27 Apr →
overpass	9–1	0.08	41%	27 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	23%	25 Apr →
nuke	16–13	-0.02	19%	25 Apr →
nuke	13–4	0.02	24%	23 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.05	29%	23 Apr →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	16%	23 Apr →
inferno	13–9	0.07	28%	23 Apr →
ancient	10–13	0.04	17%	23 Apr →
mirage	13–16	0.03	25%	22 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.06	49%	20 Apr →
overpass	13–8	0.08	25%	18 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.01	18%	16 Apr →