gmaez — CS2 Stats

76561198316666745[U:1:356401017]

962Tracked matches56%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating16,300Purple band · top ~23.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#26941 of 48207 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGgmaezFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER16,300 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning52
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53407Last 10053%Win rateWWLLLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression7.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.2

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.2
Utility5.2
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.9

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time606ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 13–6
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
53In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA41231856%0.01
dust2B32161650%0.01
infernoA95456%-0.02
ancientC73443%0.01
nukeS64267%0.01
cache31233%-0.04
overpass1010%0.02
agency110100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

83Matches
63%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
79.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22979%1.1917.3
Mirage2665%1.2819.6
Nuke650%0.9212.8
Inferno650%0.9413.0
Ancient580%1.6216.0
Train333%0.6910.7
Anubis250%1.2217.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.1%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
621msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
49.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
9.23HE damage / grenade
9.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2051% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–13-0.0118%15 May
mirage13–110.0330%15 May
dust29–13-0.0315%14 May
inferno7–13-0.0121%14 May
mirage6–13-0.0446%14 May
mirage13–80.0723%13 May
dust213–60.0225%13 May
dust216–120.0115%13 May
inferno16–140.0723%12 May
dust213–60.1314%12 May
mirage10–13-0.0216%12 May
dust26–13-0.0727%12 May
cache1–13-0.0619%12 May
dust213–60.0526%12 May
inferno13–6-0.0420%12 May
mirage13–60.0813%12 May
dust215–15-0.0423%11 May
dust21–2-0.110%11 May
inferno1–13-0.0927%11 May
mirage15–150.0418%11 May
mirage13–80.0820%11 May
mirage13–100.0215%11 May
mirage9–130.0325%9 May
inferno13–5-0.0033%9 May
mirage7–13-0.0122%9 May
dust211–13-0.0242%8 May
mirage13–50.0735%8 May
cache6–13-0.1027%8 May
mirage15–15-0.0318%7 May
dust213–110.0232%6 May
dust210–13-0.0416%6 May
cache13–30.0350%6 May
nuke15–15-0.0129%23 Apr
dust215–15-0.0510%23 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0538%22 Apr
mirage13–90.0127%22 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0319%18 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0522%13 Apr
mirage13–110.0333%11 Apr
inferno7–130.0534%10 Apr
mirage13–50.0714%10 Apr
nuke7–130.0012%10 Apr
mirage13–90.0128%9 Apr
ancient1–130.0215%17 Feb
dust29–130.0334%17 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0050%30 Sept
mirage12–16-0.0235%26 Sept
dust213–80.0125%25 Sept
dust215–150.0119%10 Sept
nuke13–10-0.0228%6 Sept
mirage13–50.0119%6 Sept
inferno13–3-0.026%5 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0219%21 Aug
mirage13–00.0227%21 Aug
dust213–70.0520%20 Jul
dust213–80.0127%19 Jul
dust213–70.0328%18 Jul
overpass8–130.0221%17 Jul
mirage13–0-0.0115%17 Jul
mirage2–130.0153%15 Jul
dust211–130.0422%14 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0137%8 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0614%7 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0336%4 Jul
mirage13–10.0610%4 Jul
ancient13–00.0867%2 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0124%1 Jul
dust213–10-0.0419%1 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0625%30 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0229%30 Jun
mirage13–40.0238%29 Jun
dust24–13-0.0233%29 Jun
dust213–100.0340%29 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0138%29 Jun
dust212–12-0.0313%28 Jun
mirage22–20-0.0020%27 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0423%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0418%26 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0433%26 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0124%25 Jun
nuke13–50.0820%24 Jun
ancient13–20.0823%24 Jun
dust213–10.1020%24 Jun
mirage13–80.0430%23 Jun
dust29–130.0128%23 Jun
mirage13–30.0425%22 Jun
dust213–30.0419%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0716%21 Jun
mirage4–130.0028%20 Jun
dust210–130.0630%18 Jun
mirage13–40.0131%18 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0630%18 Jun
mirage3–130.0235%16 Jun
dust23–00.0467%15 Jun
dust213–80.0525%15 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0018%15 Jun
nuke13–90.0027%14 Jun
agency13–6-0.0332%14 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0316%14 Jun
dust28–130.0019%14 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →