SnailSandwch — CS2 Stats

76561198296477770[U:1:336212042]

1,195Tracked matches50%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,114Purple band · top ~27.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14697 of 23351 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 978 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSnailSandwchFACEITLevel 6 · 978 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER15,114 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning59
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49501Last 10049%Win rateWWWWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7
Aggression7.4
Utility6.0
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.9
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time590ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−2.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — mirage 13–3
132Biggest win — nuke
5Longest win streak
W4Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 16ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA23131057%0.03
cacheD1861233%0.00
dust2A1610663%0.04
infernoA148657%0.01
anubisB105550%-0.01
nukeD93633%0.00
ancientD72529%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.02
overpass1010%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches
50%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
88.6ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3863%1.2216.5
Dust23853%1.6317.8
Inferno1765%1.0615.4
Ancient1631%0.9415.4
Nuke1346%1.2418.9
Cache1225%0.9818.0
Anubis1030%1.0116.4
Overpass956%1.6320.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.0%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
586msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
10.53HE damage / grenade
11.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.6159% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–100.0715%26 Aug
cache13–4-0.0817%25 Aug
ancient13–80.0316%25 Aug
mirage16–140.0216%25 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0612%24 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0118%21 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0917%21 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0716%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.033%21 Aug
dust213–80.0516%19 Aug
inferno9–130.0317%19 Aug
mirage9–130.0120%17 Aug
mirage14–160.0116%17 Aug
cache13–30.009%17 Aug
dust29–13-0.068%17 Aug
dust213–100.1012%14 Aug
mirage10–130.1017%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0122%14 Aug
vertigo13–80.0420%13 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0311%12 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0118%12 Aug
inferno13–100.0118%12 Aug
mirage13–40.0314%12 Aug
mirage13–100.1017%12 Aug
ancient14–160.0912%10 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0122%10 Aug
cache10–13-0.056%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0320%9 Aug
mirage13–10-0.019%9 Aug
cache11–130.0121%8 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0013%8 Aug
anubis13–70.1213%8 Aug
mirage13–100.1218%8 Aug
nuke9–130.077%8 Aug
mirage4–130.0911%8 Aug
nuke13–50.028%8 Aug
anubis13–70.0611%7 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0712%5 Aug
mirage16–140.019%5 Aug
ancient13–100.0016%5 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0610%4 Aug
inferno15–150.0714%3 Aug
cache12–16-0.0412%31 Jul
nuke10–130.059%30 Jul
cache9–13-0.0217%30 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0911%30 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0213%29 Jul
dust27–13-0.0020%29 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0113%29 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0417%29 Jul
cache10–13-0.0218%28 Jul
ancient1–13-0.1310%28 Jul
cache4–130.0113%24 Jul
anubis8–130.0512%24 Jul
anubis19–16-0.0412%24 Jul
dust28–130.0217%22 Jul
dust210–13-0.0217%22 Jul
mirage13–30.0626%22 Jul
dust213–11-0.0516%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0214%21 Jul
overpass10–130.0222%17 Jul
cache13–70.1018%17 Jul
cache3–13-0.076%17 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0817%17 Jul
dust213–90.0721%16 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0519%16 Jul
inferno9–130.0519%15 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0010%14 Jul
mirage9–13-0.049%13 Jul
cache17–190.0015%11 Jul
inferno13–90.0119%11 Jul
dust213–16-0.0310%10 Jul
dust213–40.0919%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0215%10 Jul
cache13–110.0222%10 Jul
dust213–40.0917%10 Jul
ancient7–130.0823%10 Jul
anubis1–13-0.086%10 Jul
mirage13–70.1424%9 Jul
dust213–90.0419%9 Jul
cache4–13-0.0114%9 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0112%9 Jul
mirage13–30.2521%9 Jul
cache7–13-0.0322%9 Jul
cache13–70.1117%9 Jul
inferno16–120.1321%9 Jul
dust28–130.0723%9 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0711%6 Jul
anubis13–80.0111%6 Jul
inferno13–60.0026%6 Jul
dust213–20.1317%5 Jul
cache13–110.0724%4 Jul
cache10–130.0728%3 Jul
cache2–13-0.0412%3 Jul
dust213–110.0218%3 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0113%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0514%1 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0117%1 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0115%1 Jul
inferno13–80.0521%1 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →