Ha Ha Clinton-Dix

Ha Ha Clinton-Dix — CS2 Stats

76561198295990770[U:1:335725042]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,185Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,689Purple band · top ~17.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14833 of 27977 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHa Ha Clinton-DixFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER17,689 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning47
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression4.8
Utility4.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning4.7
Utility4.1
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time602ms−68ms
first ⅓ avg 670ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — mirage 11–1
132Biggest win — anubis
6Longest win streak
814In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B24131154%-0.00
cacheS1611569%0.00
mirageB147750%-0.00
ancientD103730%-0.02
infernoC104640%-0.01
anubisS86275%0.02
nukeC73443%-0.03
vertigoA53260%0.02
overpassC52340%0.01
poseidon110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

49Matches
53%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
81.8ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.6%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
65.7%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
585msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
48.6%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
8.21HE damage / grenade
7.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9695% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–9-0.0721%29 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0015%29 Aug
inferno13–10-0.098%27 Aug
ancient13–5-0.078%27 Aug
cache13–8-0.0315%27 Aug
ancient14–160.0112%25 Aug
vertigo15–190.0319%22 Aug
dust29–130.0321%22 Aug
overpass13–6-0.0310%22 Aug
mirage11–10.1713%21 Aug
cache11–130.0127%21 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0314%21 Aug
vertigo22–200.0616%21 Aug
ancient25–28-0.0319%19 Aug
cache19–16-0.0221%19 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0314%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0414%19 Aug
anubis4–130.0013%19 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0412%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.0316%17 Aug
cache13–16-0.028%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0117%15 Aug
ancient11–130.0911%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0122%14 Aug
dust216–140.0417%14 Aug
inferno16–130.024%14 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0226%14 Aug
overpass9–10.0719%14 Aug
dust26–13-0.0923%13 Aug
dust213–7-0.0215%10 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0114%10 Aug
cache13–6-0.0219%10 Aug
anubis13–20.1525%9 Aug
dust220–220.0818%9 Aug
cache13–90.0616%9 Aug
dust213–20.0334%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0517%6 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0515%6 Aug
cache13–60.0215%2 Aug
cache13–2-0.0110%1 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0220%1 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0115%28 Jul
vertigo13–110.0615%28 Jul
ancient9–13-0.085%28 Jul
cache13–60.0312%28 Jul
dust213–2-0.0418%27 Jul
mirage3–130.0418%26 Jul
dust213–110.0915%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0021%26 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0815%26 Jul
dust26–13-0.0722%24 Jul
inferno1–13-0.0621%24 Jul
inferno14–160.049%23 Jul
inferno13–80.0115%22 Jul
mirage16–12-0.028%22 Jul
cache13–50.0513%22 Jul
dust25–130.0113%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0618%20 Jul
dust213–9-0.0310%20 Jul
anubis8–10.0525%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0216%20 Jul
dust213–50.0815%20 Jul
cache16–14-0.025%20 Jul
anubis13–60.0318%14 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0810%14 Jul
cache13–9-0.0025%13 Jul
nuke4–130.0010%13 Jul
dust213–11-0.0321%13 Jul
dust212–16-0.0310%11 Jul
cache6–13-0.0316%11 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0417%10 Jul
dust213–70.0315%10 Jul
inferno17–190.0715%9 Jul
vertigo11–13-0.0123%9 Jul
ancient13–10-0.005%9 Jul
overpass7–130.0215%9 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0417%8 Jul
cache13–90.0919%8 Jul
anubis13–9-0.019%8 Jul
dust26–13-0.0511%8 Jul
nuke13–90.025%7 Jul
cache7–13-0.0417%7 Jul
nuke12–5-0.0117%5 Jul
poseidon9–50.0145%5 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0119%5 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0716%4 Jul
mirage0–13-0.0411%3 Jul
overpass11–130.0113%2 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0910%2 Jul
dust213–30.1029%30 Jun
mirage8–130.0120%28 Jun
dust213–70.0324%28 Jun
ancient2–13-0.067%27 Jun
dust29–130.0020%27 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0221%27 Jun
overpass11–130.0020%22 Jun
nuke1–10-0.0727%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0713%22 Jun
dust213–6-0.0121%21 Jun
inferno9–130.0110%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →