1llo — CS2 Stats

76561198269053397[U:1:308787669]

2,318Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 Developing
CSDB Leaderboard#6425 of 6783 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,705 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1,705Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,705
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 46 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG1lloFACEITLevel 8 · 1,705 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,705csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning59
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54424Last 10054%Win rateLWWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.4
Aggression8.5
Utility6.5
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning5.9
Utility6.5
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact7.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time621ms−12ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — ancient 13–5
130Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
124In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 83% over 6ancientWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%0.01
infernoA2011955%0.00
ancientC1971237%0.02
dust2B137654%0.01
nukeS128467%0.02
anubisS65183%0.03
cacheC52340%0.01
overpass110100%0.05
vertigo110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

978Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
75.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16347%0.9014.1
Ancient10059%1.0215.5
Anubis8549%0.9715.0
Inferno6748%0.9814.9
Dust25250%1.0014.5
Overpass4955%1.0114.3
Nuke2846%1.0015.4
Vertigo2748%1.0215.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
30.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.5%Spray accuracy
69.9%Counter-strafing
11.3°Preaim
621msReaction time
29.3%T opening success
58.0%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.68HE damage / grenade
8.33Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.3412% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno7–130.0220%14 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0031%14 Aug
cache13–6-0.0016%14 Aug
inferno13–90.0014%2 Aug
ancient13–0-0.0229%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0713%28 Jun
mirage13–60.1012%28 Jun
dust213–60.0617%26 Jun
mirage13–100.0316%26 Jun
nuke13–100.0211%26 Jun
anubis13–3-0.008%26 Jun
inferno8–13-0.045%26 Jun
ancient13–20.1116%6 Jun
dust24–13-0.0221%6 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0113%6 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0616%4 May
cache12–120.0021%4 May
ancient13–16-0.0317%2 May
inferno16–12-0.0319%2 May
nuke13–4-0.0014%2 May
inferno13–80.0127%1 May
mirage8–130.0518%1 May
cache6–13-0.0022%1 May
mirage13–90.038%30 Apr
cache12–120.0224%30 Apr
cache9–20.0318%30 Apr
inferno7–130.0623%26 Apr
mirage13–80.0713%26 Apr
dust27–13-0.0219%25 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0211%25 Apr
nuke13–110.0623%24 Apr
dust25–13-0.0524%24 Apr
ancient15–150.0613%24 Apr
inferno13–16-0.0516%22 Apr
dust28–130.0121%19 Apr
overpass13–50.0517%19 Apr
inferno9–130.0315%13 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0316%13 Apr
mirage4–13-0.0011%12 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0016%12 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0215%12 Apr
mirage13–160.0014%11 Apr
ancient5–13-0.065%11 Apr
ancient15–150.0314%10 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0116%10 Apr
ancient13–100.0125%10 Apr
ancient13–50.0518%6 Apr
nuke10–130.0018%4 Apr
ancient10–130.0215%4 Apr
anubis13–40.0618%4 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0221%4 Apr
nuke13–110.0119%29 Mar
mirage13–70.0924%29 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0121%29 Mar
inferno13–80.0429%28 Mar
ancient13–60.0913%28 Mar
mirage5–13-0.049%28 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0815%27 Mar
anubis13–11-0.0112%27 Mar
mirage13–110.006%27 Mar
dust213–60.0222%27 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0132%26 Mar
ancient13–50.1127%26 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0310%25 Mar
vertigo9–70.0215%25 Mar
inferno13–10-0.017%25 Mar
ancient11–130.0024%24 Mar
inferno13–80.0517%24 Mar
dust213–40.0229%23 Mar
inferno13–110.0026%23 Mar
inferno13–80.0026%13 Mar
nuke13–60.0721%13 Mar
ancient11–130.0717%13 Mar
mirage13–80.0222%13 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0421%10 Mar
dust213–9-0.0511%8 Mar
nuke7–13-0.0221%28 Feb
nuke13–90.0525%28 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0418%28 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0733%26 Feb
dust26–13-0.0434%26 Feb
inferno9–4-0.0218%26 Feb
mirage10–130.0119%25 Feb
dust213–110.0318%25 Feb
anubis3–13-0.0223%25 Feb
dust29–13-0.0121%25 Feb
anubis13–100.0614%25 Feb
nuke13–110.0818%24 Feb
dust213–50.1022%24 Feb
mirage13–110.0320%24 Feb
anubis13–90.0717%24 Feb
inferno13–80.0016%24 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0813%22 Feb
ancient8–130.0313%22 Feb
mirage16–130.0016%22 Feb
ancient9–130.0420%22 Feb
ancient13–80.0114%22 Feb
mirage9–130.0423%22 Feb
dust213–90.0414%20 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0514%20 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →