Phi — CS2 Stats

76561198262589164[U:1:302323436]

689Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,416 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPhiFACEITLevel 8 · 1,416 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning49
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY543412Last 10054%Win rateWLLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.4
Utility6.3
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time584ms−16ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — anubis 13–4
130Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 65% over 20ancientWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA32181456%0.02
dust2S2013765%0.01
mirageB178947%0.01
infernoC167944%0.03
ancientC52340%-0.01
anubis32167%0.05
overpass31233%0.06
nuke32167%0.01
poseidon110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

154Matches
62%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
76.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust24560%1.3115.8
Mirage3678%1.2016.1
Inferno2255%1.1613.4
Ancient1164%1.0115.4
Anubis1145%0.9313.2
Nuke540%0.8711.6
Overpass580%1.3218.2
Train1100%0.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
80.8%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
585msReaction time
23.1%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
13.5%Flash assists
7.24HE damage / grenade
13.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.1194% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0413%7 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0021%7 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0321%6 Aug
mirage13–10-0.034%6 Aug
dust21–13-0.035%3 Aug
dust213–60.0225%28 Jul
ancient6–130.019%27 Jul
cache13–10-0.0021%27 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0415%27 Jul
mirage4–130.0415%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0028%27 Jul
dust216–120.0418%26 Jul
mirage4–13-0.1329%25 Jul
anubis6–130.0019%25 Jul
inferno13–60.1120%25 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0614%25 Jul
cache10–130.0424%25 Jul
mirage13–70.0619%17 Jul
cache13–70.0222%17 Jul
dust213–11-0.0010%30 Jun
cache11–13-0.0323%25 Jun
inferno2–130.0010%24 Jun
mirage11–130.0020%24 Jun
cache13–70.0523%21 Jun
inferno9–50.1536%19 Jun
mirage13–110.0110%14 Jun
dust213–80.0424%12 Jun
inferno4–13-0.079%12 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0113%12 Jun
cache13–40.0326%7 Jun
inferno13–50.0122%7 Jun
mirage13–50.0627%6 Jun
inferno13–90.0716%6 Jun
dust210–130.0019%5 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0118%4 Jun
inferno3–130.0315%4 Jun
cache13–40.0615%4 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0115%31 May
anubis13–40.1718%31 May
cache8–13-0.035%30 May
mirage12–120.0414%30 May
dust213–11-0.0015%30 May
cache13–80.0621%30 May
dust213–11-0.018%29 May
cache7–13-0.0221%28 May
cache13–00.0331%26 May
inferno13–70.1318%26 May
cache6–13-0.0416%26 May
cache13–110.0524%25 May
dust213–20.0413%17 May
inferno13–7-0.0011%17 May
cache13–10-0.0127%14 May
mirage10–13-0.0311%11 May
dust213–50.0813%11 May
cache13–70.0117%7 May
cache12–12-0.0122%6 May
cache8–13-0.0212%6 May
cache13–100.0317%3 May
cache12–12-0.019%3 May
cache13–40.0811%3 May
cache13–5-0.0317%2 May
cache12–120.0321%1 May
cache13–50.1220%1 May
cache11–13-0.0114%30 Apr
cache5–13-0.0423%29 Apr
cache13–70.0424%29 Apr
cache12–12-0.0121%29 Apr
cache6–130.0920%29 Apr
cache13–110.0216%29 Apr
cache13–10-0.0019%29 Apr
cache13–2-0.0421%29 Apr
overpass12–120.0824%25 Apr
mirage13–70.1425%25 Apr
nuke13–80.0310%25 Apr
inferno11–130.0226%25 Apr
dust213–11-0.0017%22 Apr
dust216–14-0.0314%22 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0613%22 Apr
mirage13–20.0419%22 Apr
mirage13–10-0.039%20 Apr
inferno9–130.0416%20 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0121%18 Apr
overpass10–130.0723%18 Apr
nuke7–130.0911%18 Apr
inferno10–130.1219%18 Apr
dust213–50.0812%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0334%16 Apr
nuke9–5-0.1123%5 Apr
poseidon9–10.0912%5 Apr
dust25–13-0.0413%5 Apr
ancient13–7-0.0021%2 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0315%2 Apr
dust24–13-0.0327%31 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0416%26 Mar
dust215–150.0320%26 Mar
dust213–110.0114%26 Mar
dust215–150.0222%26 Mar
inferno13–50.0129%25 Mar
overpass13–60.0415%19 Mar
dust215–15-0.0013%19 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →