saucymf — CS2 Stats

76561198258099009[U:1:297833281]

2,684Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaucymfFACEITLevel 9 · 1,983 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning42
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43552Last 10043%Win rateWLWLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8
Aggression5.0
Utility4.0
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time571ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 616ms → last ⅓ avg 571ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 13–5
132Biggest win — inferno
5Longest win streak
711In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA22121055%0.02
anubisA2011955%0.01
ancientD1841422%0.00
infernoB136746%0.03
overpassD103730%0.03
cacheA85363%0.00
mirageC52340%-0.01
dust24040%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,193Matches
50%Win rate
1.23Avg K/D
81.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis26552%1.2517.1
Ancient23249%1.2416.5
Nuke16849%1.2316.5
Inferno14246%1.1716.5
Mirage10855%1.2616.6
Overpass9351%1.3317.9
Vertigo6652%1.2216.9
Dust23537%1.0115.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.1%Spray accuracy
77.5%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
568msReaction time
25.5%T opening success
45.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
8.65HE damage / grenade
4.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.5401% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–7-0.0116%27 Aug
anubis4–130.0215%27 Aug
mirage13–60.0418%26 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0324%18 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0721%17 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0430%17 Aug
inferno13–20.1019%16 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0214%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0020%13 Aug
nuke16–130.0415%12 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0215%11 Aug
dust24–13-0.0416%8 Aug
cache6–13-0.0420%8 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0812%8 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0312%8 Aug
nuke13–90.006%8 Aug
nuke7–30.1135%8 Aug
cache15–150.0118%7 Aug
nuke11–130.0313%7 Aug
cache13–16-0.0119%6 Aug
anubis13–40.0426%5 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0324%4 Aug
anubis13–50.0211%4 Aug
anubis4–130.0124%3 Aug
cache13–50.0228%20 Jul
nuke13–50.0214%20 Jul
inferno10–130.0217%14 Jul
nuke2–130.0524%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0137%13 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0711%9 Jul
cache13–70.0129%9 Jul
ancient5–130.1021%19 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0012%4 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0219%1 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0427%1 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0019%1 Jun
dust29–13-0.0223%31 May
inferno9–13-0.0224%30 May
inferno13–90.0216%28 May
nuke13–40.0726%24 May
anubis8–13-0.0615%24 May
dust25–130.0216%23 May
ancient19–22-0.0120%23 May
anubis13–70.0111%21 May
overpass9–13-0.0328%21 May
overpass10–130.0315%20 May
ancient13–50.1624%19 May
ancient13–7-0.0014%19 May
anubis13–100.0524%18 May
anubis13–90.1017%18 May
inferno13–90.0131%15 May
overpass9–130.0213%15 May
anubis13–11-0.0218%14 May
nuke13–50.1124%12 May
overpass13–100.0618%12 May
ancient11–13-0.0216%12 May
anubis3–130.0136%11 May
mirage2–13-0.0523%11 May
inferno6–130.0022%10 May
nuke9–130.0222%10 May
anubis7–130.0121%10 May
nuke13–110.0022%10 May
nuke13–110.0836%8 May
dust211–13-0.0134%8 May
ancient10–13-0.0425%8 May
anubis13–110.0016%5 May
inferno11–13-0.0128%5 May
ancient12–16-0.0018%2 May
cache19–160.0425%2 May
nuke7–130.0927%1 May
inferno13–100.0931%1 May
ancient8–13-0.1012%30 Apr
anubis13–40.0215%30 Apr
nuke13–10-0.0524%28 Apr
overpass9–130.0219%28 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0122%27 Apr
cache16–14-0.0623%27 Apr
ancient13–110.0118%27 Apr
nuke4–130.0129%26 Apr
inferno13–50.2327%26 Apr
ancient15–150.0713%26 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0129%25 Apr
overpass9–20.0717%25 Apr
cache13–80.0530%23 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0112%23 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0722%21 Apr
anubis11–13-0.029%20 Apr
nuke13–40.0621%20 Apr
nuke13–70.0421%20 Apr
ancient13–30.1930%19 Apr
inferno13–60.0219%18 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0918%18 Apr
anubis13–10-0.0317%17 Apr
mirage13–4-0.0218%17 Apr
overpass13–40.1716%17 Apr
ancient8–13-0.0215%17 Apr
overpass11–130.0317%16 Apr
nuke10–13-0.0114%16 Apr
overpass4–13-0.0019%14 Apr
anubis13–160.0419%14 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →