6.3 elixir fatherlesscycle — CS2 Stats

SO76561198256041411[U:1:295775683]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,864Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,752Blue band · top ~29.7% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#33988 of 55354 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanSilver IV

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66

Positioning58

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–46–8Last 10046%Win rateLWWWTLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6

Aggression5.2

Utility4.6

Positioning5.8

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 656ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6

Positioning5.8

Utility4.6

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels2.5

Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time656ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 719ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms

Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — dust2 13–5

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

9Longest win streak

11–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16cacheWeakest map · 33% over 12

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	23	10–13	43%	-0.01
dust2	B	23	11–12	48%	-0.00
ancient	S	16	11–5	69%	0.01
inferno	C	14	5–9	36%	0.01
cache	D	12	4–8	33%	-0.00
vertigo	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
nuke	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.09
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

468Matches

51%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

89.0ADR

39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	3	67%	1.13	16.0
Nuke	3	0%	0.94	16.0
Ancient	3	33%	0.89	15.7
Overpass	2	50%	0.92	15.5
Inferno	2	100%	1.64	19.0
Mirage	1	100%	1.06	17.0
Anubis	1	100%	0.92	12.0
Vertigo	1	100%	1.06	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.2%Spray accuracy

79.0%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

656msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

50.3%CT opening success

0.57Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

10.09HE damage / grenade

10.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.7687% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	9–13	0.04	30%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.02	9%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.02	17%	30 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	16%	30 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.00	16%	30 Aug →
ancient	4–9	0.00	15%	30 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	16%	30 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.09	15%	29 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.06	18%	29 Aug →
cache	4–13	0.01	19%	29 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	13%	29 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	21%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.03	14%	28 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	24%	28 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	16%	26 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.00	15%	24 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.03	17%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	16%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.05	20%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	13%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–7	-0.06	21%	23 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	19%	23 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	8%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	20%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	15%	22 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.01	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	20%	22 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.06	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.04	19%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.07	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.05	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.09	13%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.05	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	12–16	0.02	20%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.06	23%	15 Aug →
anubis	0–8	-0.09	29%	13 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	12 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	13%	10 Aug →
cache	12–12	0.03	11%	10 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.08	14%	10 Aug →
cache	1–5	0.06	36%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.06	14%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.08	10%	9 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.03	17%	8 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.07	18%	8 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	8%	7 Aug →
ancient	7–13	0.02	12%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.02	9%	7 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.08	27%	6 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.05	12%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.00	23%	3 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.03	13%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.09	21%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	19%	2 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.02	20%	2 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	15%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.07	12%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.06	30%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	12%	31 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.06	14%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.03	15%	31 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.00	11%	29 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	24%	29 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	9%	29 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.01	12%	28 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	11%	27 Jul →
vertigo	8–13	-0.03	15%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	15%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	14%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	16%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	18 Jul →
vertigo	2–13	-0.03	19%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.02	11%	17 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	14%	11 Jul →
vertigo	4–13	-0.03	21%	10 Jul →
nuke	12–12	0.02	26%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.04	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	10%	5 Jul →
vertigo	13–1	0.05	8%	5 Jul →
vertigo	13–11	-0.02	9%	4 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	15%	26 Jun →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	7%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.03	10%	25 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.03	13%	23 Jun →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	12%	23 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	-0.07	18%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.00	24%	21 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.05	20%	19 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.02	12%	19 Jun →
overpass	15–15	-0.00	16%	19 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	14%	19 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	14%	19 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.07	20%	13 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.03	23%	13 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.00	22%	12 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	15%	12 Jun →