Baiter bill

Baiter bill — CS2 Stats

CA76561198242564642[U:1:282298914]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

584Tracked matches33%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBaiter billFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning55
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3
Aggression7.5
Utility3.7
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch2.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.5
Utility3.7
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time581ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — vertigo 13–8
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L6Current streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 88% over 8officeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B147750%0.00
mirageB136746%-0.01
nukeA116555%0.00
anubisB115645%-0.02
vertigoC94544%-0.02
infernoS87188%0.02
ancientC83538%0.02
officeD62433%-0.02
overpassB63350%-0.01
trainA53260%0.03
cache41325%-0.04
alpine1010%0.01
stronghold110100%-0.04
warden1010%0.00
italy1010%0.02
agency1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

82Matches
55%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
79.1ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1644%1.1915.0
Anubis1553%0.9314.1
Inferno1258%1.1515.2
Cache1145%0.8512.7
Nuke1080%1.2615.6
Ancient650%0.8211.5
Dust2667%1.2216.0
Overpass475%1.0116.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
34.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.8%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
567msReaction time
31.3%T opening success
48.4%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
11.19HE damage / grenade
4.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.3233% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache0–2-0.06100%1 Aug
nuke3–13-0.0719%20 Jul
anubis8–130.0111%20 Jul
dust26–13-0.103%20 Jul
office3–13-0.0433%18 Jul
inferno10–130.0223%18 Jul
mirage13–100.0115%18 Jul
cache13–30.0212%18 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0117%11 Jul
dust213–60.0915%11 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1015%31 May
overpass13–110.0023%29 May
mirage2–13-0.057%25 May
nuke7–130.0015%21 May
cache5–13-0.0615%17 May
mirage7–130.0322%16 May
dust213–80.0318%16 May
dust27–130.0012%16 May
mirage10–13-0.0518%10 May
nuke8–13-0.0012%10 May
inferno13–90.0721%10 May
dust28–130.0220%10 May
ancient13–110.0712%3 May
cache13–16-0.0822%3 May
dust28–13-0.0410%28 Apr
mirage7–13-0.076%28 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0418%26 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0411%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0025%26 Apr
overpass9–130.0114%26 Apr
nuke13–50.048%26 Apr
mirage13–110.0310%12 Apr
dust216–140.056%12 Apr
overpass11–13-0.058%12 Apr
inferno13–10-0.095%12 Apr
mirage13–70.0317%12 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0317%12 Apr
office13–30.0525%12 Apr
dust213–7-0.0421%11 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0219%11 Apr
inferno13–110.0810%11 Apr
dust213–10-0.0213%11 Apr
overpass13–80.0717%11 Apr
nuke13–100.0816%11 Apr
vertigo12–12-0.0713%8 Apr
office13–8-0.065%8 Apr
dust28–130.0612%8 Apr
ancient13–60.0215%7 Apr
train12–120.0517%7 Apr
mirage13–20.0421%7 Apr
dust213–60.0318%7 Apr
vertigo13–10-0.087%7 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0910%7 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0314%7 Apr
train13–30.0130%2 Apr
dust23–13-0.0318%2 Apr
nuke1–13-0.039%2 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0613%30 Mar
ancient13–60.0317%30 Mar
office12–12-0.019%30 Mar
anubis3–13-0.039%7 Mar
ancient8–130.0113%7 Mar
train13–80.0614%1 Mar
anubis9–13-0.0313%1 Mar
vertigo13–80.1312%1 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0112%1 Mar
inferno13–60.0720%1 Mar
nuke13–100.0124%14 Feb
ancient7–130.048%10 Feb
train11–13-0.0317%8 Feb
vertigo1–13-0.0311%8 Feb
dust213–10-0.018%8 Feb
overpass1–13-0.1111%7 Feb
nuke13–6-0.0019%7 Feb
anubis13–4-0.0324%7 Feb
mirage13–70.0521%7 Feb
dust23–120.0238%7 Feb
vertigo13–70.0318%7 Feb
anubis12–12-0.0114%4 Feb
nuke13–90.0313%4 Feb
inferno13–70.0617%4 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0312%4 Feb
mirage13–110.026%4 Feb
alpine6–130.018%2 Feb
anubis13–110.0315%2 Feb
stronghold13–11-0.0417%2 Feb
warden11–130.0011%2 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0133%18 Jan
italy12–120.0213%18 Jan
vertigo6–13-0.0812%17 Jan
anubis13–80.0111%17 Jan
office3–13-0.0515%17 Jan
anubis13–30.0215%13 Jan
vertigo5–13-0.0432%13 Jan
vertigo13–20.0616%16 Nov
office9–130.0124%6 Sept
overpass13–60.0414%27 Jul
train13–80.0512%27 Jul
ancient4–13-0.004%25 Jul
agency7–13-0.1011%25 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →