crayz — CS2 Stats

NO76561198210518265[U:1:250252537]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,984Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 Solid

Premier CS Rating22,110Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14459 of 54639 tracked

FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59

Positioning55

Utility84

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateLWWWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.9

Aggression8.1

Utility8.4

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like jL 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 84 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9

Positioning5.5

Utility8.4

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time589ms−15ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%+1.6%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — anubis 13–6

13–3Biggest win — ancient

3Longest win streak

3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 65% over 17cacheWeakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	B	19	10–9	53%	0.00
mirage	S	17	11–6	65%	0.01
dust2	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.00
ancient	C	16	7–9	44%	-0.01
cache	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.01
nuke	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.00
anubis	B	8	4–4	50%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

713Matches

51%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

85.3ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	106	55%	1.04	15.8
Inferno	63	48%	0.95	15.4
Ancient	49	53%	0.99	15.7
Dust2	46	41%	0.97	14.7
Anubis	26	62%	0.87	14.3
Vertigo	23	57%	0.97	15.5
Overpass	11	36%	0.75	11.7
Nuke	9	56%	0.81	13.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy

31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

31.1%Spray accuracy

71.2%Counter-strafing

9.2°Preaim

583msReaction time

29.6%T opening success

62.3%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

13.5%Flash assists

12.06HE damage / grenade

15.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.5727% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	4–13	-0.07	19%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	8%	30 Aug →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	19%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.01	21%	30 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.01	21%	27 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.06	17%	27 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	27%	26 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.03	11%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	19%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	21%	24 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.04	28%	24 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	16%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	28%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.05	40%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	26%	23 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.04	26%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.00	32%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.04	13%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.03	24%	21 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	20%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	32%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.01	18%	17 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.00	17%	17 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.06	25%	16 Aug →
ancient	6–13	0.02	14%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	21%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.03	8%	12 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.00	23%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.11	18%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	25%	11 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.04	35%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	19%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	-0.06	14%	10 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.05	17%	9 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	21%	8 Aug →
cache	9–13	0.00	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.03	19%	7 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.05	14%	7 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.03	12%	4 Aug →
inferno	15–15	-0.02	14%	4 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.01	20%	4 Aug →
ancient	9–13	-0.05	19%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	6%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.04	9%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.03	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.10	20%	3 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	15%	3 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	29%	3 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	16%	26 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.09	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	15%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	19%	26 Jul →
ancient	4–13	0.00	26%	25 Jul →
inferno	9–13	0.01	18%	23 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	18%	23 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.04	21%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.03	22%	22 Jul →
anubis	11–13	0.00	15%	18 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	14%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.05	22%	17 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.01	13%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	16%	16 Jul →
ancient	16–13	-0.00	20%	14 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	25%	14 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.02	25%	13 Jul →
anubis	2–13	0.03	19%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–10	-0.01	25%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.11	11%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	23%	12 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.01	28%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	16%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.05	17%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.07	12%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.10	19%	11 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	19%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.01	21%	10 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.05	24%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	16%	9 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.05	17%	8 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.01	13%	6 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.04	12%	1 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	24%	1 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.02	20%	29 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.08	29%	28 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.05	17%	28 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	20%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–5	0.02	31%	28 Jun →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	11%	28 Jun →
inferno	14–16	0.02	22%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.05	24%	27 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.07	20%	27 Jun →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	28%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.03	19%	27 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.05	13%	27 Jun →