Ruby — CS2 Stats

CZ76561198209941296[U:1:249675568]Steam profile ↗

2,952Tracked matches43%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,539 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65

Positioning54

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5

Aggression7.5

Utility5.7

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.9

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5

Positioning5.4

Utility5.7

Mechanics7.7

Opening Duels3.9

Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time621ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 621ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%−0.4%

first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — inferno 13–8

13–2Biggest win — vertigo

6Longest win streak

W3Current streak

10–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

15Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5overpassWeakest map · 22% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	24	17–7	71%	0.00
ancient	C	20	7–13	35%	0.00
inferno	C	19	7–12	37%	0.02
dust2	B	13	7–6	54%	0.01
overpass	D	9	2–7	22%	-0.01
vertigo	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.02
nuke	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
anubis	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.01
cache	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,041Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

80.8ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	482	48%	1.07	16.5
Ancient	421	50%	1.12	16.7
Inferno	257	51%	1.10	16.1
Dust2	195	46%	1.06	15.7
Anubis	157	52%	1.02	15.3
Vertigo	105	58%	1.13	17.1
Overpass	52	42%	1.01	15.6
Nuke	46	52%	1.01	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.1%Headshot accuracy

34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

84.9%Counter-strafing

11.5°Preaim

618msReaction time

35.1%T opening success

56.2%CT opening success

0.56Enemies flashed / flash

10.4%Flash assists

8.82HE damage / grenade

11.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.0802% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–10	0.06	23%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	21%	24 Aug →
mirage	19–15	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	14%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	15%	18 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	24%	18 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	16%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.01	18%	8 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	13%	6 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	22%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	26%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.05	12%	28 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	14%	25 Jul →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	11%	22 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	21%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.07	26%	22 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.06	31%	20 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.00	15%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.05	20%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.05	15%	2 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	13%	2 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.02	18%	21 Jun →
overpass	5–13	0.02	21%	11 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.07	10%	6 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.01	29%	6 Jun →
ancient	12–16	-0.01	17%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	16%	30 Apr →
dust2	13–9	-0.05	15%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	42%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	21%	3 Apr →
anubis	9–7	0.08	29%	22 Mar →
vertigo	13–6	-0.09	23%	22 Mar →
overpass	9–13	0.03	25%	12 Mar →
inferno	12–12	0.02	18%	8 Mar →
mirage	12–12	0.06	33%	8 Mar →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	24%	4 Mar →
inferno	15–15	0.00	24%	3 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.00	20%	17 Feb →
vertigo	13–5	-0.05	22%	15 Feb →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	20%	13 Feb →
anubis	15–15	-0.04	13%	8 Feb →
dust2	7–13	0.02	23%	8 Feb →
ancient	4–13	0.04	15%	8 Feb →
mirage	13–4	0.10	19%	8 Feb →
inferno	13–5	0.02	18%	3 Feb →
ancient	13–9	0.03	15%	29 Jan →
overpass	5–13	-0.04	12%	22 Jan →
mirage	13–8	0.04	11%	22 Jan →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	16%	19 Jan →
ancient	16–19	-0.04	12%	15 Jan →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	3%	11 Jan →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	17%	11 Jan →
overpass	8–13	-0.03	10%	4 Jan →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	17%	3 Jan →
inferno	13–11	0.05	26%	3 Jan →
mirage	16–12	0.07	22%	3 Jan →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	18%	3 Jan →
ancient	13–3	0.04	18%	21 Dec →
overpass	6–13	0.06	14%	17 Dec →
mirage	16–14	0.01	10%	12 Dec →
nuke	13–6	0.05	32%	10 Dec →
dust2	13–9	-0.02	15%	10 Dec →
ancient	10–13	-0.05	7%	10 Dec →
dust2	13–7	0.06	31%	8 Dec →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	19%	1 Dec →
overpass	10–13	-0.07	9%	29 Nov →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	20%	29 Nov →
inferno	11–13	0.02	16%	28 Nov →
overpass	19–16	0.02	18%	23 Nov →
ancient	14–16	0.03	14%	18 Nov →
nuke	13–10	0.03	20%	16 Nov →
inferno	15–15	0.03	22%	15 Nov →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	22%	11 Nov →
overpass	9–3	-0.01	13%	10 Nov →
inferno	7–9	0.04	47%	10 Nov →
inferno	13–8	0.11	22%	10 Nov →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	6 Nov →
ancient	13–16	0.01	17%	6 Nov →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	12%	31 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.10	30%	31 Oct →
inferno	13–8	0.04	23%	30 Oct →
inferno	13–7	0.07	23%	29 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.01	28%	23 Oct →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	29%	23 Oct →
vertigo	13–2	0.02	20%	23 Oct →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	19%	18 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	15%	16 Oct →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	15%	15 Oct →
overpass	6–13	-0.07	20%	13 Oct →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	17%	11 Oct →
ancient	13–5	0.09	23%	10 Oct →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	18%	8 Oct →
inferno	19–22	0.01	14%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	17%	7 Oct →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	13%	5 Oct →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	19%	29 Sept →
vertigo	5–9	-0.07	21%	29 Sept →
mirage	11–13	0.03	26%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.01	15%	26 Sept →