Ninoalex

Ninoalex — CS2 Stats

FR76561198204639631[U:1:244373903]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,597Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,231Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6416 of 28148 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,027 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNinoalexFACEITLevel 9 · 2,027 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER23,231 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning40
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51472Last 10051%Win rateLLWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4
Aggression4.2
Utility6.7
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.0
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time575ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — dust2 13–4
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 59% over 32ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA32191359%0.00
dust2B158753%-0.01
anubisA148657%-0.02
mirageC135838%-0.01
ancientC114736%-0.00
nukeA95456%-0.01
cacheC52340%0.03
overpass1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,136Matches
51%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
78.7ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno15456%1.0815.6
Anubis10661%1.0615.3
Dust27739%0.8814.7
Vertigo7360%1.0415.4
Ancient6341%0.9215.1
Overpass3863%1.2115.2
Mirage3832%0.8713.7
Nuke1625%0.7211.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
74.4%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
33.7%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
15.10HE damage / grenade
6.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8854% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache5–130.0219%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0318%23 Aug
inferno13–90.0116%23 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0412%19 Aug
nuke0–6-0.069%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0019%17 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0519%17 Aug
anubis13–60.0226%17 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0018%16 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0710%15 Aug
inferno13–1-0.0217%15 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0220%15 Aug
dust213–8-0.0013%15 Aug
ancient0–7-0.0718%15 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0524%15 Aug
mirage9–13-0.016%13 Aug
nuke13–40.0020%13 Aug
cache13–110.0320%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.069%11 Aug
inferno13–90.048%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0213%11 Aug
nuke16–13-0.0322%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0312%11 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0513%11 Aug
dust213–80.0021%6 Aug
mirage5–10.0225%6 Aug
inferno14–160.0326%6 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0113%6 Aug
cache2–130.0017%6 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0118%6 Aug
ancient13–3-0.0027%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0221%5 Aug
overpass2–9-0.125%5 Aug
inferno2–9-0.1622%5 Aug
nuke9–60.0235%5 Aug
inferno9–00.0727%5 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0612%5 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0716%5 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0220%5 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0112%5 Aug
nuke9–130.0415%5 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0220%5 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0322%5 Aug
anubis13–4-0.0410%4 Aug
inferno13–00.0916%4 Aug
cache15–150.0232%4 Aug
dust213–40.1228%4 Aug
anubis13–20.0026%3 Aug
inferno13–100.0118%3 Aug
ancient12–160.0012%31 Jul
anubis13–3-0.0111%30 Jul
inferno13–100.0211%30 Jul
dust213–4-0.0217%30 Jul
dust214–160.0316%30 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0320%30 Jul
dust29–13-0.0619%27 Jul
cache13–80.0622%22 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0413%22 Jul
inferno16–140.0214%21 Jul
inferno15–150.0516%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0416%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0215%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0230%16 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0215%16 Jul
mirage4–130.0323%16 Jul
ancient13–60.1015%16 Jul
anubis13–90.0512%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0215%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0320%9 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0719%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0617%3 Jul
mirage8–130.0111%3 Jul
dust213–4-0.0618%3 Jul
nuke13–6-0.0022%2 Jul
nuke13–110.0413%2 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0217%2 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0118%23 Jun
nuke5–13-0.0353%23 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0714%23 Jun
dust211–13-0.0222%23 Jun
dust213–9-0.0320%18 Jun
inferno13–100.1028%18 Jun
inferno9–20.0926%18 Jun
anubis9–130.0017%15 Jun
anubis13–60.0312%15 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0313%15 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0622%15 Jun
dust211–13-0.0030%15 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0112%15 Jun
inferno13–60.0420%13 Jun
dust213–6-0.0016%13 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0617%13 Jun
inferno4–130.0017%13 Jun
dust29–13-0.0116%13 Jun
mirage13–70.0516%13 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0225%11 Jun
ancient13–70.1013%11 Jun
dust213–110.0024%11 Jun
inferno13–110.0120%7 Jun
inferno4–130.0317%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →